Insult from Atletico Sinks

[Wisenhof]

Dear Friends,

Atletico Sinks and Keltanok ride with the same IP the A'in 13h.
Now I´ve have write to Atletico that he is a MULTI-Account but he denies it.
And I receive a "fuck you" as comment from him, look enclosed the chat of the race.

I hope this have a consequence for Atletico!!!

THX, Wisenhof

[RV Berlin Sued]

To suppert Wise I must say that both teams riding very suspicious. Atletico do tempo for Keltanok, groups don't even get a chance.

[Rockstar Inc]

maybe, just maybe you guys around here should stop calling every team with * multi...just annyoing if you for example work in the same office or for the same company....or like our beloved admins radler+leso previously in the same house...would you call leso+radler also multi?

just ask them what's up...read the explanation..and then judge....

[auxilium torino]

350 fino all arrivo
Taylor René (Keltanok) Apre la volata
Taylor René (Keltanok):
Nathan Ecker (Atletico Sinks) prova a seguire
Nathan Ecker (Atletico Sinks) segue

This is the finish line sprint, Keltanok is a new team, is the first race, and both team with same IP, Sinks Denied, Keltanok, not speak, is a friend, speak in FB, say Sinks
Ban noth teams, thanks, check the IP!

Keltanok with 2 sprinter 92
Sinks with a 89
keltanok sprint with one at 50, theother at 350...and sinks follow the right one...

[auxilium torino]

Online: 12
Argos-Shimano
RV Berlin Sued
RC Linz Nord
Keltanok
Atletico Sinks*
ELITE TEAM
bergwerk
Ceriale
Wisenhof
Pastis Ricard
Villazzano
vagaderi

Offline: 0

[Wisenhof]

...

[Wisenhof]

two of my colleagues play the game to but i dont ride the same race or tour. its not fair and the same as you have two accounts, i think.

maybe, just maybe you guys around here should stop calling every team with * multi...just annyoing if you for example work in the same office or for the same company....or like our beloved admins radler+leso previously in the same house...would you call leso+radler also multi?

just ask them what's up...read the explanation..and then judge....

[bergwerk cycling]

maybe there are friends and the story of the star is right ...


Then the next problem is that :

yesterday atletico makes tempo for his "friend" and not for himself
today they make a real happy (perhaps lucky) sprint ... maybe "Zufall"

but so much "Zufälle" ??? you really believe it ...

[RV Berlin Sued]

Atletico Sinks: Now it can not possibly be the same IP, but Monday I had it on my laptop learned to play, I do not know why now shown by the

Thats one answer to the accusations.
Also that the star shown next to his team must be a bug.

[Robyklebt]

Ban noth teams, thanks, check the IP!

Are you stupid?

Keltanok
Atletico Sinks*

There is no need to check the IP, it's clear they have the same IP.

But, that's not the decisive point anyway:

I try to paraphrase Buhmann, something he said a long time ago:

"I don't care about same IP, I care about teams that ride suspiciously, ride for each other"

And here it seems like they were riding for each other reading the comments by guys in their race.

two of my colleagues play the game to but i dont ride the same race or tour. its not fair and the same as you have two accounts, i think.

No, not if you fight each other.

[auxilium torino]

he say is a bg, ask to check the IP is normal

[RV Berlin Sued]

Keltanok
Atletico Sinks*

There is no need to check the IP, it's clear they have the same IP.

But, that's not the decisive point anyway:

I try to paraphrase Buhmann, something he said a long time ago:

"I don't care about same IP, I care about teams that ride suspiciously, ride for each other"

And here it seems like they were riding for each other reading the comments by guys in their race.

But he demand, that the star next to his team is a bug. He said that they don't have same IP.
Nevertheless they don't behave like 2 independent teams.

[auxilium torino]

if work, Keltanok is Banned!
if work, Atletico Sinks is Banned!

please, inform us if you see one of this team in race, Thanks!

[Robyklebt]

I certainly like the new information policy.

But maybe for new teams that are multis, it would make sense banning only one? In the end the game shouldn't want to get rid of users, but get rid of second teams.

And I hope the case for them being multis really is strong enough. Here seems clear enough, if not multi, clearly teams that ride for each other, so ok, which is not allowed either. But, as you should know not every case is so clear. 1 of your friends for example has been accused of being a multi. At the end of the discussion in the forum my guess is that most people thought: Looks like a multi. But, I agree that there wasn't enough proof for a ban, so nothing happened. The same standard should be applied everywhere.

[auxilium torino]

he ride alternately for each other, should give an old topic too with sinks

[Robyklebt]

.... read? try to understand what the others are saying?

I mentioned that here apart from the same IP he/they clearly seemed to ride for each other. Which is illegal too, so very likely is one of the stronger cases for a punishment.
The point here was: I hope you (the whole FC) has sufficient reason in all cases where there are bans.
AND, that maybe it wasn't sensible deleting both accounts, that just one sometimes could be enough. No need to get rid of users, get rid of second teams! Plus from a pragmatic point of view: Having 1 team with a bit experience left would proabably make it "easier" to just continue with that one, value already over the 15 millions, a ok team, while having 0, probably makes it more tempting to restart with 2-3+ immediately.