April 2015

luques · Post by **luques** » Sat Apr 04, 2015 3:30 pm

01/04 Krasnodar - Anapa (1.2 UCI):

06/04 Giro del Belvedere (1.2U UCI):

11/04 Trofeo Edil C (1.2U UCI):

Rastaman · Post by **Rastaman** » Sun Apr 05, 2015 11:36 am

Pokemon Club wrote:
The same for you no ? Anyway, for me it is simple, hilly paves should be normally a question of "strengh" and not of "jump", in that case the hilly influence is clearly too much for Paterberg ( and for hilly paves in general), or we adapt it wrongly

It is a matter of strength after 230k race. While if you let them do an itt for only the mur or paterberg the best jumper will win.
Your statements about strength make no sense since Quintana and Contador already showed the last 2 year that they can get a good result here.
Never ever should this be a 5, is actually one of the hardest of the "hellingen".

Pokemon Club · Post by **Pokemon Club** » Mon Apr 06, 2015 12:42 pm

I just had a look on calendar, miss 23h Paris Roubaix edition

team fl · Post by **team fl** » Wed Apr 08, 2015 12:18 pm

Question, why is PR at 10h instead of 9h as presented in the monthly PDF preview? There are some reasons, I plead for 9h:

- I could race it.
- Lunch wouldn't be a problem on a Sunday
- It was presented at 9h in the monthly PDF preview, affecting the monthly planning of teams.
- I could race it.
- Have I already mentioned that I could race it?
- Those who don't want to get up for PR at 9h but would at 10h don't deserve to take part anyway!
- Well yes, maybe I will be able to race it at 10h, but only with a mind-blowing effort...
- Still, present the information in the PDF as you do it later in the calender, or the other way round. But try to be consistent.

Go for PR at 9h!

flockmastoR · Post by **flockmastoR** » Fri Apr 10, 2015 9:37 am

team fl wrote:Question, why is PR at 10h instead of 9h as presented in the monthly PDF preview? There are some reasons, I plead for 9h:

- I could race it.
- Lunch wouldn't be a problem on a Sunday
- It was presented at 9h in the monthly PDF preview, affecting the monthly planning of teams.
- I could race it.
- Have I already mentioned that I could race it?
- Those who don't want to get up for PR at 9h but would at 10h don't deserve to take part anyway!
- Well yes, maybe I will be able to race it at 10h, but only with a mind-blowing effort...
- Still, present the information in the PDF as you do it later in the calender, or the other way round. But try to be consistent.

Go for PR at 9h!

A monument at 9h would be really great, I would ride it too at 9. More Monuments at 9 and I wouldnt miss so many of them

lennylenny · Post by **lennylenny** » Fri Apr 10, 2015 9:06 pm

Where is Castilla y Leon?
Actually no Tour next week
If Noone draws it, use a fantasy Tour than is like Castilla

Rockstar Inc · Post by **Rockstar Inc** » Fri Apr 10, 2015 10:43 pm

sure let's put 1.234.300 fantasy tours in the calender...be happy that you can ride this stupid le sarthe bullshit // to catalunya

luques · Post by **luques** » Fri Apr 10, 2015 11:05 pm

Rockstar Inc wrote:sure let's put 1.234.300 fantasy tours in the calender...be happy that you can ride this stupid le sarthe bullshit // to catalunya

// to pais Vasco

, anyway 100% agree, for this my advice was to cancel it.

Anyway, surely no fantasy tours during the real season.

Castilla y Leon anyway is ready, just read before, and leso is in holiday till 12.04 so surely won't spend his time inserting a 3day tour. The 13 you will have it.

----------------------

For PR at 9h I agree with FL, not for his eating time (that looks like way too early) but because in the preview it was written like that.

Stick to the preview, the 15h in the preview is 14h, and the night edition at 23h is missing.

Maike Sack · Post by **Maike Sack** » Sat Apr 11, 2015 9:33 pm

Castilla is online

Robyklebt · Post by **Robyklebt** » Sun Apr 12, 2015 9:15 am

Mintact for PR really is too short. Mintact from 224? Should be at the latest 205, better from 193. (98 ok too of course)

luques · Post by **luques** » Sun Apr 12, 2015 4:15 pm

Robyklebt wrote:Mintact for PR really is too short. Mintact from 224? Should be at the latest 205, better from 193. (98 ok too of course)

Agree 100%. Race is going awfully fast.

gaurain rx · Post by **gaurain rx** » Tue Apr 14, 2015 2:49 pm

LBL and Flêche out today... I'm working on it and try to finish it for the end of the week.

About Amstel (and even if I don't really feel in charge of it) slight changes.. 2 more kms around km 150 and also 2-3 more between last Gulpenerberg and Kruisberg... Will try to adapt it! Anyway, I won't change the %ages of the climbs or of the final kms so if you want any adaptation, just say it here so that we can discuss it.

gaurain rx · Post by **gaurain rx** » Thu Apr 16, 2015 10:19 am

Amstel here :

http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 1429172189

http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... ension=c4f

258 irl, 257 here... I'm missing one kilometer between the second Gulpenerberg and Kruisberg (around km 210). Hope that's no drama. Mintakt 207.

Robyklebt · Post by **Robyklebt** » Sat Apr 18, 2015 4:48 pm

Romandie finally with workable stuff. Stage 2+3 here, 4-6 tomorrow
Somehow got both distances wrong here, don't really care though

Robyklebt · Post by **Robyklebt** » Sun Apr 19, 2015 8:11 pm

Done, hope all saved etc. ok, not used to this anymore.

Post by **lesossies** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 9:04 am

I am waiting for gaurains´s Fleche but if i dont get it I will put this one online:
http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... ension=c4f

I only incoporated the Cote de Cherave 5kms vor the finish in Huy.

gaurain rx · Post by **gaurain rx** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 11:27 am

http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... ension=c4f

team fl · Post by **team fl** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 2:43 pm

gaurain rx wrote:http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 1429608394

http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... ension=c4f

second link seems not to work.

Post by **lesossies** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:24 pm

team fl wrote:
gaurain rx wrote:http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 1429608394

http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... ension=c4f
second link seems not to work.

it works now

team fl · Post by **team fl** » Tue Apr 21, 2015 3:54 pm

lesossies wrote:
team fl wrote:
gaurain rx wrote:http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... 1429608394

http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/p ... ension=c4f
second link seems not to work.
it works now

wonderful! Let's go for 14h then!

cycling4freaks.com

April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Re: April 2015

Who is online