23h Viti Levi Tour - unrealistic riding Italian connection

[glasgowracing]

What was the result of the FC discussions?

[Rockstar Inc]

the FC can only vote/propose something to buhmann...he has to react to this...that's why it takes sometimes soo long...

[glasgowracing]

any results to this?

[glasgowracing]

I try again....
How did the FC decide?

[Rockstar Inc]

the FC can only vote/propose something to buhmann...he has to react to this...that's why it takes sometimes soo long...

[glasgowracing]

the FC can only vote/propose something to buhmann...he has to react to this...that's why it takes sometimes soo long...

A: Did the FC vote?
B: Did they send a proposal or something to Buhmann?
C: What was the FC's proposal? What did Buhmann decide?

[Rockstar Inc]

bingo, these questions are way much better...

[Quick]

the FC can only vote/propose something to buhmann...he has to react to this...that's why it takes sometimes soo long...

A: Did the FC vote?
B: Did they send a proposal or something to Buhmann?
C: What was the FC's proposal? What did Buhmann decide?

Cases are not open forever. And because of the amount of cases it's impossible for me to remeber all of them. Therefore:

A: Yes, I'm 99% sure the FC voted for something.
B: Vote=proposal to Buhmann
C: Can't remember. Don't know. Chances are that he did nothing though.

Thing I know is that aux is still in the FC and that's a joke itself.

[glasgowracing]

the FC can only vote/propose something to buhmann...he has to react to this...that's why it takes sometimes soo long...

A: Did the FC vote?
B: Did they send a proposal or something to Buhmann?
C: What was the FC's proposal? What did Buhmann decide?

Cases are not open forever. And because of the amount of cases it's impossible for me to remeber all of them. Therefore:

A: Yes, I'm 99% sure the FC voted for something.
B: Vote=proposal to Buhmann
C: Can't remember. Don't know. Chances are that he did nothing though.

Thing I know is that aux is still in the FC and that's a joke itself.

A: Of course, my problem is why does the FC not remember? No database for cases? Fail.
B: Indeed.
C: Exactly, but I think an open case can only be closed with a statement of what action has been taken. The handling of fairness complaints has to be improved.

I know one team or its friends were punished for riding for oneanother, it can't be that in other cases nothing is done - especially not if an involved person is a member of the FC.

[glasgowracing]

the FC can only vote/propose something to buhmann...he has to react to this...that's why it takes sometimes soo long...

A: Did the FC vote?
B: Did they send a proposal or something to Buhmann?
C: What was the FC's proposal? What did Buhmann decide?

Cases are not open forever. And because of the amount of cases it's impossible for me to remeber all of them. Therefore:

A: Yes, I'm 99% sure the FC voted for something.
B: Vote=proposal to Buhmann
C: Can't remember. Don't know. Chances are that he did nothing though.

Thing I know is that aux is still in the FC and that's a joke itself.

A: Of course, my problem is why does the FC not remember? No database for cases? Fail.
B: Indeed.
C: Exactly, but I think an open case can only be closed with a statement of what action has been taken. The handling of fairness complaints has to be improved.

I know one team or its friends were punished for riding for oneanother, it can't be that in other cases nothing is done - especially not if an involved person is a member of the FC.

[Rockstar Inc]

A: Of course, my problem is why does the FC not remember? No database for cases? Fail. buhmann
B: Indeed.buhmann
C: Exactly, but I think an open case can only be closed with a statement of what action has been taken. The handling of fairness complaints has to be improved. buhmann

I know one team or its friends were punished for riding for oneanother, it can't be that in other cases nothing is done - especially not if an involved person is a member of the FC.

[glasgowracing]

A: Of course, my problem is why does the FC not remember? No database for cases? Fail. buhmann
B: Indeed.buhmann
C: Exactly, but I think an open case can only be closed with a statement of what action has been taken. The handling of fairness complaints has to be improved. buhmann

I know one team or its friends were punished for riding for oneanother, it can't be that in other cases nothing is done - especially not if an involved person is a member of the FC.

It's always easy to blame one person. If the FC members would push enough or organize themselves better surely improvements could be done.
A simple step would be to reply to a forum post with "vote taken, buhmann will decide". Surely such an idea doesn't need Buhmann's brain to get implemented into a comiteee process.

[Rockstar Inc]

it is to determine on one person....
only buhmann is able to do anything...only buhmann is able to recruit new members or kick old ones...

the only thing i give you my "yes" is the thing with the post...something like "members voted, case now up to buhmann"

[Quick]

A: Of course, my problem is why does the FC not remember? No database for cases? Fail. buhmann
B: Indeed.buhmann
C: Exactly, but I think an open case can only be closed with a statement of what action has been taken. The handling of fairness complaints has to be improved. buhmann

I know one team or its friends were punished for riding for oneanother, it can't be that in other cases nothing is done - especially not if an involved person is a member of the FC.

It's always easy to blame one person. If the FC members would push enough or organize themselves better surely improvements could be done.
A simple step would be to reply to a forum post with "vote taken, buhmann will decide". Surely such an idea doesn't need Buhmann's brain to get implemented into a comiteee process.

You know what? Pavler-PTT-Sporties multi-case.

Opened it. Was alone in the thread fpr maybe 2 or 3 days. Others joined. 3 in total(I think we need 4 ban votes for an imediate ban). Leso (the 4th who voted for no ban) said he has already banned Pavler. Ok. 2 days later - I ride a race with him. Write leso pn - pavler not banned. Leso answers: temporary ban until the case is clear is ok for him but he's already banned in the database and doesn't know why he still can ride.
Wrote 5 days later a pn to him, what he's going to do now because they all still ride. Still waiting for an answer. Wrote the last pn on the 7th of April.

Gave up.

[Allagen]

pavler with 27 saison races in april. that do not look like a ban

[glasgowracing]

If there's no proof, you can't ban those accounts. I just know these Pavler, PTT (and probably more) accounts are freaking parasites and one of them got punished today. Fuck them. But there's a thread for that PTT/Pavler problem too.

I have opened this case and have never received an answer, that's why this thread will get pushed up by me until I get an answer.