I did it :
![Image](http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/et1asouth10.png)
![Image](http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/et1bsouth10.png)
![Image](http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/et2south10.png)
![Image](http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/et3asouth10.png)
![Image](http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/et3bsouth10.png)
![Image](http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/et4south.png)
![Image](http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/et5south10.png)
![Image](http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/et6asouth10.png)
![Image](http://www.radsportfreaks.de/radsport/et6bsouth10.png)
a boring tour ...
![Laughing :lol:](./images/smilies/icon_lol.gif)
Moderators: systemmods, Calendarmods
you are not up to dateLuna wrote:Tour of Southland originally for 5 riders per team.
Bolivia nothing found yet. Or my Spanish is too bad. Maybe someone could find it out. Or we wait until there's a startlist. But I can't imagine that race to bne for 8 riders.
In my eyes that's two different topics:Robyklebt wrote: ... but really don't like the way the real number of riders per race is pushed here in this thread.... Still no real opinion about it, but why not first get a consensus or a decision by Buhmann/Leso instead of trying to get it done here? Nothing against Southland with 6 or whatever actually, don't mind at all. But would that then mean that in spring when the real races start we have automatically accepted the real numbers?
I believe I did!Team Franconia wrote:beghelli for example was on the same day than paris tours, maybe some teams wanted to ride both too...okay they should have posted it...
Bolivia is perfect why do you want to change it ?lesossies wrote:I am against Bolivia parallel to "Campeonato de los Andes".
Bolivia maybe later or adapted to RSF, maybe shorted to 4-6 days.
To start Southland 1 day before could be a good idea. 6 or 7 riders ?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 7 guests