Next Gen Stats – Discussion & Feedback Thread

[flockmastoR]

so its not just me good but the thing is i usually took care of not going over 60 because i thought its exactly like the spreadsheet shows too.. i just was wondering about the high % of kramberger and then realized its coz of all slots.. and you wrote it too with the 24 over 60 .. i thought something is not right here shouldnt there be already some downtraining.. checked your spreadsheet and yeah thats how i remember it.. hm weird

And thanks for the general comment on the spreadsheet.

Looks like that 24 years downtraining is not possible at all (Zelinka 78 downhill). So there might be missing a if condition somewhere. Others are invited to check their percentages. Good community validation here

[Tukhtahuaev]

Also no downtraining possible for my 24 year old

[flockmastoR]

Also no downtraining possible for my 24 year old

The calculation says it should, at least from the buhmann code I know

So there are 3 possibilities:
I use an outdated code version (Which I believe has not changed in decades)
I miss any other spot where this downtraining of 24 year olds is ignored
We all risk losing skills for our 24 year olds and are just lucky all the time

[Berlin Marks]

Or the whole rsf training calculation is a lie and there are black lists where I’m at

[flockmastoR]

NGS - S02 - Debunking Training Myths

I have updated the training_percentages Excel file, I deleted the downtraining chances for 24 year olds.

When looking at the code, I still cannot figure out why this is the case but maybe Alkworld can help here

By implementing the buhman code, I get those negative percentages, and it is also seen from the code that it is intendent to have downtraining there, but either the code is outdated and other stuff is redesigned (somewhere else) or it is somehow impossible to reach that line of code (which from my point of view shouldn't be).

[Radunion]

If I got it right, there is downtraining at 24 for skills above 60. Maybe somebody can test it. I do not have a 24-year-old and could only test it for 50 and 66 tomorrow.

[Robyklebt]

Lafuente and Kotibaruly, both train only their main skill with no down-training possible.

I sort of remember that a while back I was surprised when I saw that 24 year olds didn't downtrain, but the memory is hazy, maybe only imagining a memory now.... Anyway, thought, oh, 24 is still safe too, remembered wrong, and forgot it again.

Should be 65 for sprint though, limit is +10, no?

[flockmastoR]

If I got it right, there is downtraining at 24 for skills above 60. Maybe somebody can test it. I do not have a 24-year-old and could only test it for 50 and 66 tomorrow.

Zelinka 24 gets no minus and has high sprint and downhill and mountain> 60

[flockmastoR]

Lafuente and Kotibaruly, both train only their main skill with no down-training possible.

I sort of remember that a while back I was surprised when I saw that 24 year olds didn't downtrain, but the memory is hazy, maybe only imagining a memory now.... Anyway, thought, oh, 24 is still safe too, remembered wrong, and forgot it again.

Should be 65 for sprint though, limit is +10, no?

The skill shift is +5 for sprint.

[Berlin Marks]

If I got it right, there is downtraining at 24 for skills above 60. Maybe somebody can test it. I do not have a 24-year-old and could only test it for 50 and 66 tomorrow.

Bozic 85 flat. No spots on flat is 0%. No downtraining

[Hansa]

If I got it right, there is downtraining at 24 for skills above 60. Maybe somebody can test it. I do not have a 24-year-old and could only test it for 50 and 66 tomorrow.

Bozic 85 flat. No spots on flat is 0%. No downtraining

jup even on 86 flat its 0%

[Radunion]

Thanks everybody, got this wrong. Realistically only downhill and 66 sprint guys are affected, so I missed my error.