cycling4freaks.com

Why not to make a premium version of RSF??

Why do not do a version a bit more' expensive RSF, in which it could have all the results of his own team of cyclists on a permanent basis?

I think it would not be a problem to pay 5 euro more per month ... in most other games, the color of the shirt, flag or logo, etc.. exist only for premium players ... and you might add a few more little thing in '

and all these games are not as cool as rsf cause of that

thats for sure not the only or main-reason, but with for example 5€, some players would think about it twice,buying a licence or not..

i don´t think that 5 euro are a big money in one year...
but my idea was 2 licens price:
one normal for 10 euro, like now, and another one for 12/15 euro, with more featuers, a little plus.

I think that more players like this extras in a game, and at the same time, Buh and Leso can work a little more to make the game better

auxilium torino wrote: I think it would not be a problem to pay 5 euro more per month ...

you mean "per year", no?

Normally it's the gamemaster who decides this or asks if somethink like that is wanted...

Personally i dont like this system with premium accounts and so on...thats one point i love about RSF!

el Galactico wrote:Personally i dont like this system with premium accounts and so on...thats one point i love about RSF!

Me too!

It´s not my job. So it´s okay the way it is now. if i would have to earn my money with this, i would think about other options.

I would very much like to see an activation fee for any team that wishes to enter the real world of RSF (implying participation in races above cat 1 or buying riders younger than 24 or whatever). That would extremely reduce the widespread multi accounting. Just 2, 3 or 5 Euros would keep the cheaters away from their business. Or the obligation to buy a half-years license. Something like that.
For those who don't want to pay that initial fee only a limited version would be available.

i think this is impossible luna.. a lot people don't want buy licenze and if they can't play the "full" version they go away.. so next month there could be only 100 teams very boring...

That's a wild speculation.

There are more teams than 100 who keep buying licences. They would remain uneffected by that.

And if 300 would leave RSF, another 300 would come back because it's less contaminated by cheats.

maybe the real number are 300 / 30 money for people are all

and i think there are a most important ting to solve first: the teamwork that's the realy problem not the noob with 2 teams

I understand both arguments, so I made a little pro and con list:

PRO
- helps perhaps against Multiaccounts
- RSF would be played by "freaks" - as wanted. Especially the big races.

CON
- maybe users will leave RSF
- Buhman doesn't want it in general (see post at Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:10 pm)



maybe you find some more pro and cons? ad(d) it!

big tours are only for who pay like sheik.. but little tours no i try to open a new proposal in a new trhed