offline attack in the 2 half of race

Discussion about technical stuff and suggestions for improvement.

Moderator: systemmods

Post Reply
Pirkio
Posts: 1056
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:40 pm
Contact:

offline attack in the 2 half of race

Post by Pirkio » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:24 pm

Fast and easy.

My proposal is to remove all the attack in the 2 half of the race from all the offliners.. Japan tour some days ago.. Ille was of from 20 km.. He attacked and win the stage.. in the end he was offline from 30 km's not fair at all..
----------------------------------------------
Motorizzati Corse

We're back!

team fl
Posts: 5043
Joined: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:43 am
Contact:

Re: offline attack in the 2 half of race

Post by team fl » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:36 pm

Pirkio wrote:Fast and easy.

My proposal is to remove all the attack in the 2 half of the race from all the offliners.. Japan tour some days ago.. Ille was of from 20 km.. He attacked and win the stage.. in the end he was offline from 30 km's not fair at all..

First: Why in the second half? Esp. the second half attacks are the offline attacks that make sense. Offline attacks in the first half of the race usually don't. So either no offline attack at all possible or possible for the whole race, in my opinion.

Second: Did I understand it right? Ille was the first 20 km and the last 30 km of that stage off? And he attacked while he was off? Not when he came back online? If he was off in the end, why did nobody else try to attack and use the situation?

Third: Why did Buhman invent offline settings at all? Exactly. To be able to give orders to your riders when you're offline. If it makes sense or not is another question...
I didn't mean to say it. But I meant what I said.

bergwerk cycling
Posts: 1470
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:21 am
Contact:

Re: offline attack in the 2 half of race

Post by bergwerk cycling » Fri Dec 21, 2012 12:56 pm

Think the same as pirkio ... in our tour happened the same, one offline 100% that day, you take him with you the last hill and attack than himself last 3 km and win ... really not nice and you could nothing against it. Everytime suprised ...

For me its only a penalty to the onliner, and a advantage for the offliner!

Hang on someone to go with him ok, but attack offline is in my eyes really not good!


I know it happened not so often at normal days and not everyone use it ... but its really not fine.

But specially for the Nationalraces it have to change really ... only onliner could attac at least!

Pirkio
Posts: 1056
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:40 pm
Contact:

Re: offline attack in the 2 half of race

Post by Pirkio » Fri Dec 21, 2012 1:41 pm

team fl wrote:
Pirkio wrote:Fast and easy.

My proposal is to remove all the attack in the 2 half of the race from all the offliners.. Japan tour some days ago.. Ille was of from 20 km.. He attacked and win the stage.. in the end he was offline from 30 km's not fair at all..

First: Why in the second half? Esp. the second half attacks are the offline attacks that make sense. Offline attacks in the first half of the race usually don't. So either no offline attack at all possible or possible for the whole race, in my opinion.

Second: Did I understand it right? Ille was the first 20 km and the last 30 km of that stage off? And he attacked while he was off? Not when he came back online? If he was off in the end, why did nobody else try to attack and use the situation?

Third: Why did Buhman invent offline settings at all? Exactly. To be able to give orders to your riders when you're offline. If it makes sense or not is another question...

Probably (Sure) I not explain myself..

1)Second half because an attack in the first half realy hard give you the stagewin, surely.. Also offline attacks in first half are bad, so maybe ok.. Remove all attack and tempo setting If offline from more than 10 km? Should be good the same.

2)No, in the first km maybe he was also off but I don't care about the first kms.
He was off in the last 30 km.. maybe more.. just attacked (when offline) in the last 10 km.. that's let him win the stage I don't think that's fine at all. He was lucky and attacked the same km where I attacked.. Group lost 1 minute from me and 1,10 from him in the attack km.

3)That's page is also good for who is online, so I don't think that's page is ONLY for offline settings.. After all, should be ok if during h 20:00 stage I put a rider in tempo, go eat and want to switch tempo during my dinner. Attack button a bit different.. Also if you don't come back in.. What's happend if someone block you? You will make the last km's in tempo? So you will ride for someone who will win the stage cause of your offline strategy.. Not fair..

So my point of view is..
1)You win the stage with offline attack? No fair win.
2)You can't escape with offline attack? No fair help.
3)You want to set an attack on that km? Ok if you are in game will give you the attack.
4)You want to stop/made A BIT of tempo? Ok.

That's another key of the proposal.. sometime you can see some team offline who made tempo for.. 30.. 40.. don't know how many kms.. (In tour expecially)

So..
1) If team is offline (don't care how much kms,) No attack
2) If team is in tempo and go offline, after X kms stop tempo also no sprint should be good.. (X very short variable.. maybe 10 km?)
3) If team is offline for Y km remove settings (help + follow + tempo settings) If don't like the short no sprint timing use no sprint in this timing. (Y long variable maybe 60 - 70 km)
4) If team is online for all the kms give him a price. Let him attack when he want, let him have his settings, and let him an advantage from who isn't online.
----------------------------------------------
Motorizzati Corse

We're back!

Robyklebt
Posts: 10074
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:50 pm
Contact:

Re: offline attack in the 2 half of race

Post by Robyklebt » Fri Dec 21, 2012 4:38 pm

Saw Myanmar 18 or 17h last stage the other day. Yellow offline. What does he do? Offline settings. He rides red with 2 good flat riders. Then when they were dead? Nothing. Clearly a mistake, he should have put somebody in red tempo the whole stage. But ok, he did his work as GC leader he controlled the first part for the sprint teams, even over controlled. So then the sprint teams took over and get their sprint. Oh, no. The onliners, despite some back and forth from one of the guys finally decided the right thing to do was: Attack with their GC guys and get the GC win for one, top 3 for another, green for another, stage win for another one again (that didn't work, since the green guy got it).
What do I want to say with this? As long as offliners are getting fucked, raped, up the ass regularly at the first opportunity, forced to perform oral sex, eat fecal matter and talk with Manghi at the second, there is no reason to cut their possibility for any offline settings. Incl attacks.
Of course sometimes it's frustrating. But so it must be for the guy mentioned above who lost his GC in a flat stage after having been online the first 4 days of a 5 day tour. His own fault because he didn't put in better offline settings? Same things for onliners... their fault because they didn't put in good online settings.
Of course the people doing the fucking, raping etc are not necessarily the same ones as those complaining about offline attacks.
There are "abusers" on both sides, onliners and offliners. But we shouldn't do the rules according to those abusers. Which will hurt the whole rest of the users, because of the action of the "abusers" everybody loses some options. Not good. And of course everybody sees what's ok and what not differently too.
Example:
-Take advantage of the first time a guy is offline and eliminate him from the tour? Idiotic. Happened in the example above, happened in the afternoon Giro this year.
-Eliminate a guy who is mostly offline after a few days of this? I see no problem really.
-Offline attacks for stages... not really sure about that myself... In a way why not, mostly has to do with how often the guy is online too. Work the first 150 km, then off for the last 30... why shouldn't he? All day off, go at the end... not fantastic, if he has tempo settings with the helpers before.. ok, then more ok again somehow
- But offline attacks for stage race wins? Again, a guy that is offline every day, like Ringos used to be, and attacked offline almost everyday, finally winning the last stage and making Ariostea sweat in the 2007 Tour of Ethiopia in January... not good. Could have won the race there even. And was offline most of the tour actually. BAD. But... last day of the Andes for example, let's say Hill was 1" in front of Trapani... Trapani better form. I can't be on for that day.. find no sitter. So after fighting for 2 weeks I don't get the chance to finish the job on the last day unless I'm online? Not good.


So, for Pirkios proposal:
1) If team is offline (don't care how much kms,) No attack Disagree. Depends on the situation. I have seen fair and good offline attacks. And the opposite too.
2) If team is in tempo and go offline, after X kms stop tempo also no sprint should be good.. (X very short variable.. maybe 10 km?) Not good. Sprinter team rides the whole day, has to go off 15 km from the end? Alk has an unexpected meeting? Somebodies boss comes into the office? The ape gets an attack of diarrhea?
3) If team is offline for Y km remove settings (help + follow + tempo settings) If don't like the short no sprint timing use no sprint in this timing. (Y long variable maybe 60 - 70 km) Why? Most of the time the offliners are guys that... actually wouldn't have to do anything if they were on either. Sprint day in a tour, 80 sprinter in Team x, 5 guys with 90 or more. Team x doesn't want to attack? And that sprint day has no time? Why should he be forced to check in after 60-70 km to keep his help? He'll check in to put in sprint after the last intermediate, GPM anyway if he wants to sprint. If there's none.. .ok, then not.
4) If team is online for all the kms give him a price. Let him attack when he want, let him have his settings, and let him an advantage from who isn't online. The price is already there. Fun! Much more than being offline. Yes, sometimes frustrating if somebody surprisingly attacks off at the end.. but sitll had fun before.
Agree with BWs national championship thing though... but that's a whole other mess anyway.,

Otherwise? Let's grow up. Don't always demand technical solution for human problems. Treat the offliners if you're on, the onliners if you're off, like you would want to be treated by them. Adjust that depending on who it is, maybe, ok, people with "offline/online abuse" histories would get treated differently by me as well. But generally do what you would hope the others would do. If you have offline settings, mention that you have them when you make them. Don't need to say WHAT of course. If somebody is off after figthing for something for x days, don't fuck him over just like that. Etc etc.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!

Pirkio
Posts: 1056
Joined: Mon Aug 30, 2010 9:40 pm
Contact:

Re: offline attack in the 2 half of race

Post by Pirkio » Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:07 pm

Look here.. Bugatti Guadaloupe h 17

in tempo since km 1 offline from 69 km.. You really want to say me this is a good thing for the game?
----------------------------------------------
Motorizzati Corse

We're back!

Robyklebt
Posts: 10074
Joined: Thu Feb 11, 2010 6:50 pm
Contact:

Re: offline attack in the 2 half of race

Post by Robyklebt » Fri Dec 21, 2012 7:18 pm

I never claimed Bugatti was good for the game :!: :!: :!:

His tempo now? Logic and he has to do it. Why? Too many people around who would take advantage of him being offline if he didn't. Bugatti himself of course being the first one who would propose mass attacks if yellow and sprinter nr 2 was offline...
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!

Post Reply

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 18 guests