And that has nothing to do with your idea to NOT allow newcomers to ride against more experienced teams. Those teams had their first successes in group 2 and 3 (not category i guess, you meant group probably) not because they weren't allowed to ride vs more experienced managers, they were and presumably did, but because there were more splits. That is a calendar planning thing. Less editions, more splits, more group 2. Go to the calendar section for that. Also offer more D6 races, something that should be easy, because right now we are at 0.Yamaka Corse wrote: ↑Wed Jun 10, 2026 12:42 pmI invite the ape to watch the first 5 D1 players - palmarès - load all - push on cat and watch how many of them started in cat2 (alkword started in cat3!)
Division Resizing
Moderator: systemmods
Re: Division Resizing
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Got a carrot from FL. But they threaten to take it away now.
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Got a carrot from FL. But they threaten to take it away now.
Re: Division Resizing
When I think back (long-term memory still working), I was glad to have both. I learned so much more riding against experienced teams than in field 2 races. And looking at participation, we will get splits again, just not with parallel tours.
-
Gipfelstuermer
- Posts: 2110
- Joined: Wed Jul 13, 2011 10:43 am
- Location: Weltenbummler
- Contact:
Re: Division Resizing
Correct.
Calendar planning is one thing. Total number of players / participation is another one.
My fellow cyclingfreaks: ask not what the game can do for you - ask what you can do for the game.
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 24 guests