BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
Moderators: systemmods, fairplaymods
BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
I have 2 big problems with the newest BMX case!
While I'm not a big fan of BMX and his constant whining, occasional insulting, nonstop wild mood swings, his lack of understanding of the game combined with trying to tell everybody how to ride, what is going on now with him is completely wrong:
1) BMX is banned. But not officially as punishement for his insults. He's basically banned waiting for the committee to reach a decision. First time I see this happening (not for multies, for insults and so on) The usual way to handle cases is:
a) open a thread
b) comments by all concerned
c) comments by everybody else that wants to say something
d) waiting...
e) occasional question on when the final decision will come
f) final decision announced, punishment administered.
g) whining about the too tough punishment, or about the too light punishment.
This time?
a) open a thread
b) comments and ban for BMX
c) Now he's temporarily but indefinetly banned.
Highly irregular. It's just not acceptable to ban somebody indefinetly, and then have him wait until you reach your decision.
Ban somebody temporarily? Yes, until the person calms down, the insulting spree is over, then unban and think about the real punishment. A real ban, a fine, whatever. But having somebody banned temporarily and indefinetly... well, that's a bigger offense than the insults BMX is happily throwing around.
2) Topic deletion by Rexona. An explanation on why you think you have the right to delete a topic that was not made by you? Explanation why you think you should keep the moderator powers in the forum that you just abused?
And of course deleting single posts like wookie does regularly is not the right thing to do either. 24th of September we had 8 posts deleted by wookie. Same explanation as Rexona.
Anyway, the BMX case now is a big mess, he is banned indefinetly, AND he gets threads relevant to his case in the forum deleted. Not locked, DELETED.
While I'm not a big fan of BMX and his constant whining, occasional insulting, nonstop wild mood swings, his lack of understanding of the game combined with trying to tell everybody how to ride, what is going on now with him is completely wrong:
1) BMX is banned. But not officially as punishement for his insults. He's basically banned waiting for the committee to reach a decision. First time I see this happening (not for multies, for insults and so on) The usual way to handle cases is:
a) open a thread
b) comments by all concerned
c) comments by everybody else that wants to say something
d) waiting...
e) occasional question on when the final decision will come
f) final decision announced, punishment administered.
g) whining about the too tough punishment, or about the too light punishment.
This time?
a) open a thread
b) comments and ban for BMX
c) Now he's temporarily but indefinetly banned.
Highly irregular. It's just not acceptable to ban somebody indefinetly, and then have him wait until you reach your decision.
Ban somebody temporarily? Yes, until the person calms down, the insulting spree is over, then unban and think about the real punishment. A real ban, a fine, whatever. But having somebody banned temporarily and indefinetly... well, that's a bigger offense than the insults BMX is happily throwing around.
2) Topic deletion by Rexona. An explanation on why you think you have the right to delete a topic that was not made by you? Explanation why you think you should keep the moderator powers in the forum that you just abused?
And of course deleting single posts like wookie does regularly is not the right thing to do either. 24th of September we had 8 posts deleted by wookie. Same explanation as Rexona.
Anyway, the BMX case now is a big mess, he is banned indefinetly, AND he gets threads relevant to his case in the forum deleted. Not locked, DELETED.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Got a carrot from FL. But they threaten to take it away now.
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Got a carrot from FL. But they threaten to take it away now.
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
The first thing you said is false. He is banned for reiterating insults, not for waiting a decision that instead has already been taken.
So basically we just did what you said here, "Ban somebody temporarily? Yes, until the person calms down, the insulting spree is over, then unban and think about the real punishment. A real ban, a fine, whatever.", and no there would have been no other punishment after it. But until now we don't see that the person calmed down, neither his inulting spree is over and punishment can also increase as long as he continues like this.
As for point 2, I think we already discussed for that.
The case isn't a mess, as long as BMX thinks that he can do whatever he wants there is no other option than letting him banned. Actually I think that the FPK has been even too much nice and comprehensive with him, as the idea was to ban him just until he didn't calm down.
But more he writes in the forum and worse his situation goes it seems.
Anyway I pm him to try to solve the whole thing.
So basically we just did what you said here, "Ban somebody temporarily? Yes, until the person calms down, the insulting spree is over, then unban and think about the real punishment. A real ban, a fine, whatever.", and no there would have been no other punishment after it. But until now we don't see that the person calmed down, neither his inulting spree is over and punishment can also increase as long as he continues like this.
As for point 2, I think we already discussed for that.
The case isn't a mess, as long as BMX thinks that he can do whatever he wants there is no other option than letting him banned. Actually I think that the FPK has been even too much nice and comprehensive with him, as the idea was to ban him just until he didn't calm down.
But more he writes in the forum and worse his situation goes it seems.
Anyway I pm him to try to solve the whole thing.
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
Ok, show me that he didn't calm down.
Any insults you can show me in the forum before today?
Any insults you can show me in the forum before today?
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Got a carrot from FL. But they threaten to take it away now.
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Got a carrot from FL. But they threaten to take it away now.
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:00 am
- Contact:
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
I will not unban I will that you delete me
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
For the first point luques said enough.
And btw we already banned guciuzuza for some days.
For the second point, yes, i deleted those posts in the "Fairplay Komitee" thread, because they were nonsense and off topic.
Edit: This was just the second time, i guess. The first time was for the same reason, off topic and nonsense.
And btw we already banned guciuzuza for some days.
For the second point, yes, i deleted those posts in the "Fairplay Komitee" thread, because they were nonsense and off topic.
Edit: This was just the second time, i guess. The first time was for the same reason, off topic and nonsense.
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:00 am
- Contact:
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
I would tomorrow play the game please when it is O. K. for FPK
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
every hour another decisionBMX Bycicle wrote:I will not unban I will that you delete me
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:00 am
- Contact:
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
Can someone give me a Tip: Playing with a new Team or further with BMX
-
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 8:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
BMX, trying not logging into the forum for a few days, that will prob solve the problem.
-
- Posts: 71
- Joined: Thu Dec 03, 2015 9:00 am
- Contact:
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
I have a talk with Luques in moment per PN
-
- Posts: 227
- Joined: Sun Aug 24, 2014 8:33 pm
- Contact:
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
You can log in, but try not to speak on main fairplay forums, im sure it'll all blow over.
-
- Posts: 3102
- Joined: Sun Feb 21, 2010 1:21 am
- Contact:
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
Tonight Guciuzuza was in race...Wookie wrote:For the first point luques said enough.
And btw we already banned guciuzuza for some days.
For the second point, yes, i deleted those posts in the "Fairplay Komitee" thread, because they were nonsense and off topic.
Edit: This was just the second time, i guess. The first time was for the same reason, off topic and nonsense.
Allenatore Italia - Manager Dainese OG 10 bronzo TTT
Manager SantiNelli WC 10/10 argento TT
Manager SantiNelli WC 3/11 6/11Oro TT
Allenatore Italia WC 9/11 Oro RR
Non contare mai il numero dei tuoi avversari... affrontali!
Multi hostes, multus honor
Manager SantiNelli WC 10/10 argento TT
Manager SantiNelli WC 3/11 6/11Oro TT
Allenatore Italia WC 9/11 Oro RR
Non contare mai il numero dei tuoi avversari... affrontali!
Multi hostes, multus honor
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
Wookie wrote:For the first point luques said enough.
And btw we already banned guciuzuza for some days.
-
- Posts: 187
- Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 1:50 pm
- Contact:
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
Moin Miteinander,
where can i read that discussion, cause i cant think of a justified reason to delete a complete thread.
that being said i second that:
Hmmm if nonsence or off topic were the sole reason for deleting that posts, not only this very fred, but the entire forum would look much different if it would be executed on a regular bases. That said there obviously must be a reason some nonsence / off topic post get deleted whereas most doesnt. So that leaves me very much interested in the reasons those posts got deleted for real. I prefer to have posts moved, rather than deleted if they dont fit in a particular topic and as for nonsence... pfff dont see any harm in not deleting those either or move em to a nonsence section.Wookie wrote: ...
For the second point, yes, i deleted those posts in the "Fairplay Komitee" thread, because they were nonsense and off topic.
Edit: This was just the second time, i guess. The first time was for the same reason, off topic and nonsense.
who? where? when?luques wrote:...
As for point 2, I think we already discussed for that.
...
where can i read that discussion, cause i cant think of a justified reason to delete a complete thread.
that being said i second that:
cheers deuseRobyklebt wrote:...
Explanation why you think you should keep the moderator powers in the forum that you just abused?
And of course deleting single posts like wookie does regularly is not the right thing to do either. 24th of September we had 8 posts deleted by wookie. Same explanation as Rexona.
...
"Listen to everyone, read everything, believe nothing unless you can prove it in your own research."
Milton William Cooper
Milton William Cooper
Re: BMX case, forum mods, fairness committee
Wookie and Rexon are from the "fairness committe" and are fairplaymods, they're not responsable about all the forum...nice imagination though.deuseburger wrote:
Hmmm if nonsence or off topic were the sole reason for deleting that posts, not only this very fred, but the entire forum would look much different if it would be executed on a regular bases. That said there obviously must be a reason some nonsence / off topic post get deleted whereas most doesnt. So that leaves me very much interested in the reasons those posts got deleted for real. I prefer to have posts moved, rather than deleted if they dont fit in a particular topic and as for nonsence... pfff dont see any harm in not deleting those either or move em to a nonsence section.
cheers deuse
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest