cycling4freaks.com

Ok, to follow procedure I'll ask for a nice IP check

Start with Delfini and look how many other accounts have the same IP.

My guess is... something above 20. And my conviction is that it's only 1 player. Naming of the riders, way of riding, online time management, all too similar.

Some of the teams that in my opinion will show up in this IP check are:

Delfini (obviously, since I ask you to check from there)
ornyorny
joffre
velavela
maremare
unouno
tourtour
tramonto
Blublu
james
overblu
Milan
Cipcip
Furfante
Games
rothmans
Kingre
Granduca
gmmark
NoPikouze (ok ok, this one not.... just wanted to have a list of 20 teams)

Fairly sure all those teams except the last one are playing from the same IP. And all have the same human manager. And there is another list with 5+ teams where I'm not sure, but suspect it's the same guy again. Then probably there's another x accounts that I haven't even checked.


Sooooooooooooo, how about an IP check Buhmann? And if you can a "password check"... doubt these accounts have all different passwords... I have trouble remembering one.... with 20+...
And once that's done give the guy 12 hours to respond... well, all 20+ guys if necessary...
Those teams actually at times have a fairly big influence on the races. Without Joffre I wouldn't have won Catalunya... not because he did anything or even was online for more than 5' per day, but by getting yellow and not defending it... I had an easy win in the end. If another guy had yellow... nope. And Delfini with his pavéman, ornyorny with his climber etc, even by doing nothign, just being there, the influence is often HUGE.

Oh, 25 teams with the IP...have blocked all of the teams.

Grrrr, I missed 5! Dammit.

Well, 6 in case NoPikouze wasn't part of it

This guy must be an organisational genius. Maybe he could help Buhmann bring some Organisation in RSF

I think there's another team in addition to those covered by roby: lunaluna: same behavior on-off, as the same name: luna (x2)

Can you do a second sweep?

IMO the good man has new teams already, early suspects

lunaluna
azzurra
sorry
erreesse
azzurri
yellows
rouge
gobaby

azzurri is riding at Bavaria 10h, exactly the way Roby describes and that is the usual style of "delfini and co". With DeGendt he has good chances for a Top3 place in the GC.

Buhmann please check and take action as soon as possible.

Today is the itt and he's still there...

you can add "Solarium". Tour of Belgique 23:00. 3 flatstages 3 days off. in todays tt online and get the win. parasite team ³ with italian flag and 0 answer in chat. could be Delfini

azzurri and azzurra are still riding...
14h Slovenie and 15h Tour du Sud

romaroma also still riding...

and still riding...today with offline tactic, probably should ride another tour with another team...thank you!

today, 18 september 2012 Lago di Garda 15 hours
Online: 12
Ille Racing
Black-Star
Nemmen Spass
Samurais
MG Cicling Team
Rasmussenbank
Crazy Vikings
BayernPower
Alex Leopard
Elmo-Tours
rastullah
vagaderi

Offline: 5
lunaluna(83)
De la Galactico(56)
carnaghese(84)
bisceglie(18)
Pastis Ricard(83)

Ip check, thanks!

lunaluna participating in the Tour de Sud de Maroc at 14h.

Another sweep maybe...
The asshole after the ban of his first 25 teams happily made new ones, and still making new ones obviously. Example Delfino made just before the Andes...azzurri then rode Kerala, as FL mentioned lunaluna South Maroc. rouge (who seems to be part of it too, although strangely I don't seem to insult him in fairness votes, as I do with the other ornyteams) already inscribed for Haleakala.

Another sweep, another round of bans would be nice. Even if Mr Asshole then just makes the next 20 teams... .mmh, maybe in his special case an IP ban would make sense? If that's somehow possible?

OK I banned some .
IP ban maybe later.

OK, but hoped you did a short IP check. Not just take the names we wrote here, we could be wrong on some teams after all

IP Ban is senseless. Most of the users have dynamic ips.

I made an IP check
These ips didn´t seem to be very dynamic but it is never sure.