cycling4freaks.com

cataracs wrote: ↑

Wed Aug 20, 2025 11:13 am

Why didn't you repport this then??

Here we go into "allowed words" territory again.

Schappy clearly has the intention of insulting Taka here. And is under the impression that if he uses "loser", he won't be fined since Taka once wasn't for the same word. Completely ignoring context, whatever that might have been in this earlier decision. Here Schappy wasn't even in the race, that I remember, but posted it completely unprovoked in the spectators chat. (HM, Taka winning, I think I'll be able to find the race, he can't be winning that often) Ha, easy, (even if Taka wins more than he should) 08-14

As said, Schappy not in the race but feels the need to provoke/harass/insult Taka, thinks by using a word that once wasn't sanctioned in the past he won't be fined. This is an egregious case IMO. There is no sensible explanation for this message in which Schappy's goal wasn't to provoke/insult/harass Taka. Taka posted nothing objectionable in the race chat. This Schappy message in the spectators chat was completely unprovoked. It shows cold blooded intent to cause emotional harm to Taka. Which seems to have failed, since Taka claims it doesn't really bother him, but he's just pointing out the hypocrisy of it. I here say that maybe it did cause emotional harm to Taka, but maybe he doesn't want to show it since he might feel it makes him come accross as weak. Maybe I'm wrong, but we shouldn't just take Taka's word for it. So maybe Schappy's attempt didn't fail. Whatever the success of this cold blooded attempt, it also shows that the whole "holier than you, we want a clean chat" attitude by Schappy might just be a façade, Schappy himself here seems to feel extremely comfortable insulting another user, as long as he knows, or thinks to know, that he won't be held accountable for it. The combination of these 2 factors IMO make this here a very grave case.

A very blatant case of somebody trying cold bloodedly harm and insult another user. If we are serious about our clean friendly sterilized chats and forums, this can't be let go. I'm sure Schappy himself will support this too, after all he has shown remarkable and commendable effort in trying to make sure there are no insults or provocations in the game. Or I'm right and it's just a façade, an attempt to fine people he doesn't like. Here it's either or. He wants a clean game, then he will publicly plead guilty and support my demand for punishment. Or he will plead innocent, exposing his campaign as a charade. Will the real Schappy please stand up?

The sad part is: Obviously, Schappy thinks "loser" is an insult, as he stated in his accusation post himself. Meanwhile, r TAKA thinks it's not (in that particular context at least), also clearly stated. So when Schappy is calling r TAKA a loser (in capital letters) he calls r TAKA something he himself (regardeless of the FPC decision) sees as an insult. So while r TAKA did something he didn't consider an insult (which might be wrong too), Schappy insulted him deliberately, after he thought the FPC wouldn't fine it.

team fl wrote: ↑

Mon Aug 25, 2025 10:59 am

The sad part is: Obviously, Schappy thinks "loser" is an insult, as he stated in his accusation post himself. Meanwhile, r TAKA thinks it's not (in that particular context at least), also clearly stated. So when Schappy is calling r TAKA a loser (in capital letters) he calls r TAKA something he himself (regardeless of the FPC decision) sees as an insult. So while r TAKA did something he didn't consider an insult (which might be wrong too), Schappy insulted him deliberately, after he thought the FPC wouldn't fine it.

Who said, r Taka dont think "LOSER!" isnt an insult? Caplocks and Exclamation mark sounds he write it in an aggressive Tone and without any dialog in this race.

In your context your forgot, that he get multiple warnings and advises to stop offensive language against me.

schappy wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 26, 2025 7:22 am

In your context your forgot, that he get multiple warnings and advises to stop offensive language against me.

You're a big troll and a big bully, and the FPK is a big trash for supporting you all the way.

My offensive language is ALWAYS a reaction to your chat provocations, or your stupid way of riding that totally kills the game. But the FPK when " investigating" my ass, fail to see that, everytime. You get mad and sell your team, I get 500k fine. You give me-3 for no reason I give it back you come cry here and I get another fine. You fall down the stairs and come write here they give me another fine...Totally makes sense. But when someone as toxic as Hansa is allowed to the FPK I lose all hopes on it.


kills the game: The most important part of the game is the 1-2hours race, and when someone like you decide to completely ruin it you get no sanctions at all. Amazing fair play rules.

cataracs wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 26, 2025 8:43 pm

Amazing fair play rules.

Always open for suggestions on how to improve the rules

Otherwise maybe time to bury the hatchet.

Why is this case being ignored aswell??

FPC is investigating the case.

The FPC decided on a warning for Schappy

schappy wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 26, 2025 7:22 am

Who said, r Taka dont think "LOSER!" isnt an insult?

He thinks it's an insult, ad he thinks I think it's an insult. But still use it against me?

So Insulting me is allowed? But when I insult back I get 500k fine? If you can't take neutral decisions leave the FPK.

cataracs wrote: ↑

Tue Sep 09, 2025 12:35 pm

schappy wrote: ↑

Tue Aug 26, 2025 7:22 am

Who said, r Taka dont think "LOSER!" isnt an insult?

He thinks it's an insult, ad he thinks I think it's an insult. But still use it against me?

So Insulting me is allowed? But when I insult back I get 500k fine? If you can't take neutral decisions leave the FPK.

You forget, you get no fine for that. And no warning, so my "Penalty" is harder then for you.
No problem to explain it to you after so much insluts of you against other you can lose sight of it.

I didn't ask your fucking opinion