Page 1 of 2
defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:54 pm
by schappy
Next time, he make a hard defamation about my person.
2025-02-01 r TAKA Schappy -3 You found the tempo button! But your brain lagged and gave me -3? that if you have one.
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 1:12 pm
by team fl
schappy wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:54 pm
Next time, he make a hard defamation about my person.
2025-02-01 r TAKA Schappy -3 You found the tempo button! But your brain lagged and gave me -3? that if you have one.
Why do you give him -3 in the fairplay votes constantly?
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 1:15 pm
by schappy
Because he doing what he do in the past and he never apology or show a little bit remorse.
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 2:40 pm
by Elaska
team fl wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 1:12 pm
schappy wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 12:54 pm
Next time, he make a hard defamation about my person.
2025-02-01 r TAKA Schappy -3 You found the tempo button! But your brain lagged and gave me -3? that if you have one.
Why do you give him -3 in the fairplay votes constantly?
Hé is doing the same shjt with me and when I ripost he starts crying here like a little baby opening fpc, all what he know to do.
My last fpc with him "The FPC decided not to give a fine to Elaska. But we expect Elaska to consider Schappys critique regarding his behaviour towards him.
Hansa"
And then our last race gives free - 3 again without having any interaction with him.
Then what are you expecting???
If you gives free - 3 then assume and stop crying here with these senseless fpc
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 5:31 pm
by Bear
I really dont understand how humanes can produce problems again and again without any reason.
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sat Feb 01, 2025 9:06 pm
by NBeullens
Schappy, you might have to just stop giving fairplay votes all together. I know that you want the FPC to have work but it's becoming a bit much. To be fair TAKA aint no stranger to the FPC either but still. Yesterday he and ATB had a small altercation which didnt result in fairplay votes or an FPC case. So we might have to tone down on the revenge minus points or I will drag sweetlemmon on here as well

Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 7:37 am
by schappy
NBeullens wrote: ↑Sat Feb 01, 2025 9:06 pm
Schappy, you might have to just stop giving fairplay votes all together. I know that you want the FPC to have work but it's becoming a bit much...
What are you talking about, i want the FPC dont have work, that will be great. How would you feels, when over year some guys talking to you, that you are to dumb for this game and for pressing buttons. And now he says to me my brain lagged, if i had one. How you feel, if someone say to you, you dont have a brain? And its not the first dafamation from this guy. I dont know, why anybody care about -3 fairplay voting. Big Donkey for example give OL since begin of 2024 -3 after every race. I do this, because, the last bad words are not long ago.
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:24 am
by cataracs
My last "derogatory sentence" was a month ago, we didn't interact since then...
Nothing hapened in yesterday's race, why give me -3?
I care about -3 as much as you care about my jokes
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:06 am
by team fl
cataracs wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:24 am
I care about -3 as much as you care about my jokes
That means... a lot?
But seriously, if you would not care about the -3, why give him the fairplay vote you did?
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:57 am
by NBeullens
I see you Schappy, I think the best thing might be for everybody involved (schappy, taka, elaska) to just stop giving fairplay votes to each other and try to keep it as diplomatic as possible in the race chats. I don't think this will get resolved anytime soon

Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 12:17 pm
by cataracs
team fl wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:06 am
cataracs wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:24 am
I care about -3 as much as you care about my jokes
That means... a lot?
But seriously, if you would not care about the -3, why give him the fairplay vote you did?
You didn't get it! He thinks my jokes are "degratory" and "defamation"...same for me, -3s especially silent ones irritate me.
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:03 pm
by team fl
cataracs wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 12:17 pm
team fl wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:06 am
cataracs wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:24 am
I care about -3 as much as you care about my jokes
That means... a lot?
But seriously, if you would not care about the -3, why give him the fairplay vote you did?
You didn't get it! He thinks my jokes are "degratory" and "defamation"...same for me, -3s especially silent ones irritate me.
now i get it, thanks

Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 6:01 pm
by Schartner Bombe
team fl wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:03 pm
cataracs wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 12:17 pm
team fl wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:06 am
cataracs wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 10:24 am
I care about -3 as much as you care about my jokes
That means... a lot?
But seriously, if you would not care about the -3, why give him the fairplay vote you did?
You didn't get it! He thinks my jokes are "degratory" and "defamation"...same for me, -3s especially silent ones irritate me.
now i get it, thanks
This "You found the tempo button! But your brain lagged and gave me -3? that if you have one." is supposed to be a joke?
I think the FPC should help rTaka out, which is generally referred to as a "joke".
It's more of a joke that rTaka is allowed to write these provocations, insults, ... again and again.
Is this going to be the new normal in C4F?
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 7:23 pm
by schappy
Gut, wenn das FPC nicht mal den Fall aufnehmen will, dann weiß ich ja woran ich hier bin.
Wünsche euch viel spaß bei de Spiel und in der freundlichen Community.
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:17 pm
by Elaska
Schartner Bombe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 6:01 pm
team fl wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:03 pm
cataracs wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 12:17 pm
team fl wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:06 am
That means... a lot?
But seriously, if you would not care about the -3, why give him the fairplay vote you did?
You didn't get it! He thinks my jokes are "degratory" and "defamation"...same for me, -3s especially silent ones irritate me.
now i get it, thanks
This "You found the tempo button! But your brain lagged and gave me -3? that if you have one." is supposed to be a joke?
I think the FPC should help rTaka out, which is generally referred to as a "joke".
It's more of a joke that rTaka is allowed to write these provocations, insults, ... again and again.
Is this going to be the new normal in C4F?
Free negative votes aren't provocation?
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:59 pm
by Tukhtahuaev
FPC is investigating the case!
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:10 pm
by ATB - Racing
Elaska wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:17 pm
Schartner Bombe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 6:01 pm
team fl wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:03 pm
cataracs wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 12:17 pm
You didn't get it! He thinks my jokes are "degratory" and "defamation"...same for me, -3s especially silent ones irritate me.
now i get it, thanks
This "You found the tempo button! But your brain lagged and gave me -3? that if you have one." is supposed to be a joke?
I think the FPC should help rTaka out, which is generally referred to as a "joke".
It's more of a joke that rTaka is allowed to write these provocations, insults, ... again and again.
Is this going to be the new normal in C4F?
Free negative votes aren't provocation?
rofl ... you always gave me "-" votings for ... yeah i dont know what for. + you insulted me in your votes ... and now you are writing such a question??? great definition of irony
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:51 pm
by Elaska
ATB - Racing wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:10 pm
Elaska wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:17 pm
Schartner Bombe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 6:01 pm
team fl wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 3:03 pm
now i get it, thanks
This "You found the tempo button! But your brain lagged and gave me -3? that if you have one." is supposed to be a joke?
I think the FPC should help rTaka out, which is generally referred to as a "joke".
It's more of a joke that rTaka is allowed to write these provocations, insults, ... again and again.
Is this going to be the new normal in C4F?
Free negative votes aren't provocation?
rofl ... you always gave me "-" votings for ... yeah i dont know what for. + you insulted me in your votes ... and now you are writing such a question??? great definition of irony
Look at historic, I only respond to your votes.
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2025 9:43 am
by team fl
As long as players use the fairness votes just for their personal like or dislike of a player or a player's race behaviour (which has nothing to do with fairness in its intended meaning), it is useless to give them any value other than personal notes to check in the future for yourselves. So why bother?
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2025 10:43 pm
by ATB - Racing
Elaska wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:51 pm
ATB - Racing wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:10 pm
Elaska wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:17 pm
Schartner Bombe wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 6:01 pm
This "You found the tempo button! But your brain lagged and gave me -3? that if you have one." is supposed to be a joke?
I think the FPC should help rTaka out, which is generally referred to as a "joke".
It's more of a joke that rTaka is allowed to write these provocations, insults, ... again and again.
Is this going to be the new normal in C4F?
Free negative votes aren't provocation?
rofl ... you always gave me "-" votings for ... yeah i dont know what for. + you insulted me in your votes ... and now you are writing such a question??? great definition of irony
Look at historic, I only respond to your votes.
what a joke you are ...
2012-05-09 Elaska ATB - Racing -2 pfff
But as it has nothing to do with that Schappy case here, i will stop it.
and will continue giving you the fair play votes you gave me ... until you apologize for your constant insinuations
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Mon Feb 03, 2025 11:17 pm
by Radunion
Even if I am do not know what the FC is discussing. Can I remind you that this is about the used language, not about negative fairplay votes.
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Tue Feb 04, 2025 2:05 am
by Elaska
ATB - Racing wrote: ↑Mon Feb 03, 2025 10:43 pm
Elaska wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:51 pm
ATB - Racing wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 11:10 pm
Elaska wrote: ↑Sun Feb 02, 2025 9:17 pm
Free negative votes aren't provocation?
rofl ... you always gave me "-" votings for ... yeah i dont know what for. + you insulted me in your votes ... and now you are writing such a question??? great definition of irony
Look at historic, I only respond to your votes.
what a joke you are ...
2012-05-09 Elaska ATB - Racing -2 pfff
But as it has nothing to do with that Schappy case here, i will stop it.
and will continue giving you the fair play votes you gave me ... until you apologize for your constant insinuations
2012 ?

Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 7:38 pm
by Tukhtahuaev
FPC decision: 500k fine for offensive language. Please note that the severity of the fine is in large part due to r Taka being a repeat offender. If this behaviour continues, fines will also increase further.
We also advise Schappy to not give further -3 fairplay votes without explanation to not add any more fuel to the fire.
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Fri Feb 14, 2025 8:14 pm
by cataracs
lol what the fuck is that? the clowns who voted for it shouldn't be in the FPK
Re: defamation by r Taka
Posted: Sat Feb 15, 2025 8:53 am
by flockmastoR
cataracs wrote: ↑Fri Feb 14, 2025 8:14 pm
lol what the fuck is that? the clowns who voted for it shouldn't be in the FPK
Defamatory false accusations of players in their role as a volunteer (Developer, FPC member, NC member, Calendar Manager, Race Designer or other role), in particular falsely accusing them of manipulations to their own advantage with the effect of harming the game’s reputation.