Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
Moderators: systemmods, fairplaymods
Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
Teams who do nothing all race. Just suck and come in the end to win.I understand everyone is allowed to ride as they like and I have generally no problem with it, however I feel like these teamsdestroy the game and it might be the most/only fun they get out off it. Most are suspected multies too.
Maybe don't directly ban them but invent a new fair play role or say at a total of -50 fairnesspoints you're automatically invested by the FP-comitee.
Looking forward to get a response, especially from one of the accused teams.
Maybe don't directly ban them but invent a new fair play role or say at a total of -50 fairnesspoints you're automatically invested by the FP-comitee.
Looking forward to get a response, especially from one of the accused teams.
J-Czucz hype train
-
- Posts: 718
- Joined: Mon Jun 13, 2011 9:49 pm
- Contact:
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
IMO, you can't force someone to ride,even if he's favo. It's sad but, it's he game. I don't like them too but i'm against this kind of fair-play rules.
Anyway, you can often beat them by riding more aggressively so, do it.
Anyway, you can often beat them by riding more aggressively so, do it.
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
Could be worth to check Lumbi and Gambrinus...
Both teams with with a team building that look like a multi-team. Same race-behaviour and same chat-attitude...which means sucking, dont paticipate on the chat and winning at the end with superior classic riders...
Could be twins...or a multi. If my suspicion is right, there could be more teams from this manager because the Gambrinus- and Lumbi-riders are getting old and it seems to be to late to replace them for younger ones.
Both teams with with a team building that look like a multi-team. Same race-behaviour and same chat-attitude...which means sucking, dont paticipate on the chat and winning at the end with superior classic riders...
Could be twins...or a multi. If my suspicion is right, there could be more teams from this manager because the Gambrinus- and Lumbi-riders are getting old and it seems to be to late to replace them for younger ones.
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
Short check:
Gambrinus and Team Aut with the same IP---> viewtopic.php?f=16&t=4055&start=25
Team Lumbi and Gabel with the same IP today
Gambrinus and Team Aut with the same IP---> viewtopic.php?f=16&t=4055&start=25
Team Lumbi and Gabel with the same IP today
-
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Norimberga
- Contact:
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
and all of them happily riding on 

"I'm an old-school sprinter. I can't climb a mountain but if I am in front with 200 metres to go then there's nobody who can beat me.” Mark Cavendish, at the 2007 Eneco Tour
-
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 11:15 am
- Contact:
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
Why should they be ban ?
Same problem as team belloz / TUTTI FRUTTI (and 2 more teams...) IP check is useless, a multi team manager has just to say "we are brother" "we work in the same place".
I will probably ride VUELTA then using the same artefact.
Same problem as team belloz / TUTTI FRUTTI (and 2 more teams...) IP check is useless, a multi team manager has just to say "we are brother" "we work in the same place".
I will probably ride VUELTA then using the same artefact.
Paris - Roubaix 2016
Milan - San Remo 2015
Tour de France 2013
4x French Champion 2017, 2018, 2020
GP E3 Harelbeke 2020
2x Paris - Tours 2013, 2019
Gand - Wevelgem 2018
Amstel 2015
Fleche Wallonne 2015
Milan - San Remo 2015
Tour de France 2013
4x French Champion 2017, 2018, 2020
GP E3 Harelbeke 2020
2x Paris - Tours 2013, 2019
Gand - Wevelgem 2018
Amstel 2015
Fleche Wallonne 2015
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
Jägermeistercycle?
I am watching you...
I am watching you...

Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
We can ban them.
The question is why we should.
The question is why we should.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Got a carrot from FL. But they threaten to take it away now.
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Got a carrot from FL. But they threaten to take it away now.
- flockmastoR
- Posts: 3546
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 11:42 pm
- Contact:
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
If there are really teams around that always make ultra expensive teams for big tours and after that just start a new team we should 1) try to avoid that or 2) kill the rule that doesnt allows managers with just 1 team to race with minus money
Otherwise it would be just a way to bypass the rule
Otherwise it would be just a way to bypass the rule
Boaz Trakhtenbrot:
Schrödinger's Dogs: Alive & Dead
- Winner Giro 2022
- 10 GC wins
- 16.609 Eternal Points
Schrödinger's Dogs: Alive & Dead
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
Always like the idea of making fairnesspoints count. At the moment they are useless, so I agree with this "invent a new fair play role or say at a total of -50 fairnesspoints you're automatically invested by the FP-comitee."Quick wrote:Teams who do nothing all race. Just suck and come in the end to win.I understand everyone is allowed to ride as they like and I have generally no problem with it, however I feel like these teamsdestroy the game and it might be the most/only fun they get out off it. Most are suspected multies too.
Maybe don't directly ban them but invent a new fair play role or say at a total of -50 fairnesspoints you're automatically invested by the FP-comitee.
Looking forward to get a response, especially from one of the accused teams.
- Coroncina2
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 11:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
Ansach: 1573 racè and 49 won.
Team Lumbi: 578 racè and 98 won.
In samè racè, Team Lumbi favo and off (sèèm not first timè). Ansach far no favo work much. Ansach attack (72 79 sprint 59 ) at -23 followèd by Team Lumbi (76 78 sprint 65 ) no comuncation but Ansach continuè alonè to work. at -3 Ansach attack and no onè follow but racè was ovèr with front at 1 min.
Timè to find anothèr way to control multy? or you want wait will almost all fair tèam will stop to play borèd of this?
Team Lumbi: 578 racè and 98 won.
In samè racè, Team Lumbi favo and off (sèèm not first timè). Ansach far no favo work much. Ansach attack (72 79 sprint 59 ) at -23 followèd by Team Lumbi (76 78 sprint 65 ) no comuncation but Ansach continuè alonè to work. at -3 Ansach attack and no onè follow but racè was ovèr with front at 1 min.
Timè to find anothèr way to control multy? or you want wait will almost all fair tèam will stop to play borèd of this?
Mens sana in corpore sano
- Coroncina2
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 11:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
Another strange race.
Lotto-Soudal work all race just because wasn't in front but no chance to win.
Team Grambrinus clear favo start to work in peloton just after Lotto-Soudal has no more power to control and win easy.
No same IP but it's 1 more race that show the IP control is not enought.
Lotto-Soudal work all race just because wasn't in front but no chance to win.
Team Grambrinus clear favo start to work in peloton just after Lotto-Soudal has no more power to control and win easy.
No same IP but it's 1 more race that show the IP control is not enought.
Mens sana in corpore sano
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
Burn the witch!Coroncina2 wrote:Another strange race.
Lotto-Soudal work all race just because wasn't in front but no chance to win.
Team Grambrinus clear favo start to work in peloton just after Lotto-Soudal has no more power to control and win easy.
No same IP but it's 1 more race that show the IP control is not enought.
I didn't mean to say it. But I meant what I said.
- Coroncina2
- Posts: 358
- Joined: Thu Sep 12, 2013 11:16 pm
- Contact:
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
So when someone will help me to win without chance to win or I'll help a team killing my riders for 4° place would be normal.team fl wrote:Burn the witch!Coroncina2 wrote:Another strange race.
Lotto-Soudal work all race just because wasn't in front but no chance to win.
Team Grambrinus clear favo start to work in peloton just after Lotto-Soudal has no more power to control and win easy.
No same IP but it's 1 more race that show the IP control is not enought.

Mens sana in corpore sano
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
Burn Coroncina!Coroncina2 wrote:So when someone will help me to win without chance to win or I'll help a team killing my riders for 4° place would be normal.team fl wrote:Burn the witch!Coroncina2 wrote:Another strange race.
Lotto-Soudal work all race just because wasn't in front but no chance to win.
Team Grambrinus clear favo start to work in peloton just after Lotto-Soudal has no more power to control and win easy.
No same IP but it's 1 more race that show the IP control is not enought.

I didn't mean to say it. But I meant what I said.
-
- Posts: 202
- Joined: Sun Mar 13, 2016 10:18 pm
- Contact:
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
than please ban the offline rider Sierra de Madrid too 
He is a parasite

He is a parasite
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
I still think that everybody during the race is free to make the tactic he prefer.
I like anyway the first proposal by Quick.
I like anyway the first proposal by Quick.
Re: Why can't we ban teams like Betty, Lumbi, GasGas etc.
Me too, still.luques wrote:I still think that everybody during the race is free to make the tactic he prefer.
I like anyway the first proposal by Quick.
J-Czucz hype train
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest