TUTTIFRUTTI case
Moderators: systemmods, fairplaymods
-
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 11:15 am
- Contact:
TUTTIFRUTTI case
Dear FPC,
I would like to open the TUTTIFRUTTI case following the study of some strange fact:
- TUTTIFRUTTI line-up in Peloponese Tour
- TUTTIFRUTTI palmares and activity
Line-up in Peloponese Tour:
603k for a Cat.2 tour
No problem if it was a regular team with 15 riders, with regular activity in RSF.
Important fact is that TUTTIFRUTTI is only a 9-riders team -> which means that for every single race (even ones he is not able to win), he should line-up a 603k team.
Palmares and Activity:
Since 2011, only 214 races with a really strange repartition -> High activity all along 2012 with a normal palmares / No activity at all in 2013 / Back in SEP-2014 with a monster team
TUTTIFRUTTI is only riding races/tour he is able to win (make sense)
Few question then:
-> How is he able to sustain such induced cost ? Is there a rule "when x team is under -xxxK budget you can not ride anymore" ?
-> What is he doing the rest of the time ? Riding with another team ?
-> How do he manage to build a new team each time ? Letting TUTTIFRUTTI in a period of non activity -> when possible RESET the team and build a new monster ?
People are asking him those questions, no answer -> Ariostea: Tutti - you have only 9 riders in your team? how do you survive financially?
TUTTIFRUTTI is a case highlighting that it is easy for a manager to:
- Build a monster team dedicated to sprint/mountain/classic with huge cost
- Use it and destroy tours
- Let it fall when all riders are too old
- Reset
- Build a new team
I would like to open the TUTTIFRUTTI case following the study of some strange fact:
- TUTTIFRUTTI line-up in Peloponese Tour
- TUTTIFRUTTI palmares and activity
Line-up in Peloponese Tour:
603k for a Cat.2 tour
No problem if it was a regular team with 15 riders, with regular activity in RSF.
Important fact is that TUTTIFRUTTI is only a 9-riders team -> which means that for every single race (even ones he is not able to win), he should line-up a 603k team.
Palmares and Activity:
Since 2011, only 214 races with a really strange repartition -> High activity all along 2012 with a normal palmares / No activity at all in 2013 / Back in SEP-2014 with a monster team
TUTTIFRUTTI is only riding races/tour he is able to win (make sense)
Few question then:
-> How is he able to sustain such induced cost ? Is there a rule "when x team is under -xxxK budget you can not ride anymore" ?
-> What is he doing the rest of the time ? Riding with another team ?
-> How do he manage to build a new team each time ? Letting TUTTIFRUTTI in a period of non activity -> when possible RESET the team and build a new monster ?
People are asking him those questions, no answer -> Ariostea: Tutti - you have only 9 riders in your team? how do you survive financially?
TUTTIFRUTTI is a case highlighting that it is easy for a manager to:
- Build a monster team dedicated to sprint/mountain/classic with huge cost
- Use it and destroy tours
- Let it fall when all riders are too old
- Reset
- Build a new team
Paris - Roubaix 2016
Milan - San Remo 2015
Tour de France 2013
4x French Champion 2017, 2018, 2020
GP E3 Harelbeke 2020
2x Paris - Tours 2013, 2019
Gand - Wevelgem 2018
Amstel 2015
Fleche Wallonne 2015
Milan - San Remo 2015
Tour de France 2013
4x French Champion 2017, 2018, 2020
GP E3 Harelbeke 2020
2x Paris - Tours 2013, 2019
Gand - Wevelgem 2018
Amstel 2015
Fleche Wallonne 2015
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
my guess is:
the "if your budget is below minus 100k then you can´t inscript for races anymore"-rule is not working at the moment - is that possible?
(was it minus 100k? - not sure about this) - but once there was such a rule.
the "if your budget is below minus 100k then you can´t inscript for races anymore"-rule is not working at the moment - is that possible?
(was it minus 100k? - not sure about this) - but once there was such a rule.
-
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Norimberga
- Contact:
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
imo it's not a case for the fairplaysection...more the technic part...maybe time to "reintroduce", next to the 100K rule, the "you can only have x "lowered price riders"
Tutti is a good example how fucked up the system is
worst case example how to spoil the fun for others...no offense to him personally...good old "don't hate the player, hate the game"
@100K-Rule...was discussed in the "Girl Power Case"...Leso was involved...rule in general not working since a few years already

Tutti is a good example how fucked up the system is


@100K-Rule...was discussed in the "Girl Power Case"...Leso was involved...rule in general not working since a few years already
"I'm an old-school sprinter. I can't climb a mountain but if I am in front with 200 metres to go then there's nobody who can beat me.” Mark Cavendish, at the 2007 Eneco Tour
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
that´s not good - we need this rule.rule in general not working since a few years already
otherwise just farming a super-team and then fuck the team up and reset - is the best way to win races. I don´t think we want this.
it will only lead to farming and multi-teams...
-
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Norimberga
- Contact:
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
the rule isn't changend...it still exisits...but technically it's not working...was gone as the design was changed a few years ago
"I'm an old-school sprinter. I can't climb a mountain but if I am in front with 200 metres to go then there's nobody who can beat me.” Mark Cavendish, at the 2007 Eneco Tour
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
yes, that´s what i mean - we need this rule working.
so this should go to the bug-forum...
so this should go to the bug-forum...
- Pokemon Club
- Posts: 3208
- Joined: Mon Oct 17, 2011 1:37 pm
- Contact:
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
The discussion has is place in fairplay too, as all others rules too.ariostea wrote:yes, that´s what i mean - we need this rule working.
so this should go to the bug-forum...
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
whatever - don´t care where we discuss that.The discussion has is place in fairplay too, as all others rules too.
but Buhman should get this done.
-
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:40 pm
- Contact:
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
Great rule.
When your finances are -100 K then you should not be able to inscript in any other tour / race.
Totally agree.
When your finances are -100 K then you should not be able to inscript in any other tour / race.
Totally agree.
-GC: Giro'15,'16,18,19;TDF'16,'18,'20;Vuelta'16,'17,'18;Tirreno'16,Catalunya'16,'18,Suisse'16,Romandie'16, Vasco'19,Andes'16
-Stages won in GTs:57
-Classics:17
-Stages won in GTs:57
-Classics:17
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
Please, yes, get this done.
It's a bad example for new players, kills atmosphere in groups, and they steal money and points from honest teams, building it in the good way.
Tuttifrutti is only a highlight of the situation, but it's plenty of teams profiting what was listed here.
It's a bad example for new players, kills atmosphere in groups, and they steal money and points from honest teams, building it in the good way.
Tuttifrutti is only a highlight of the situation, but it's plenty of teams profiting what was listed here.
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
Have spoken with Radler yesterday in our race about this problem. Hope he will tell Buhmann about the situation 

-
- Posts: 443
- Joined: Fri Oct 10, 2014 8:40 pm
- Contact:
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
Tutti had so sell Valerio in order to be able to play next days Ș))
-GC: Giro'15,'16,18,19;TDF'16,'18,'20;Vuelta'16,'17,'18;Tirreno'16,Catalunya'16,'18,Suisse'16,Romandie'16, Vasco'19,Andes'16
-Stages won in GTs:57
-Classics:17
-Stages won in GTs:57
-Classics:17
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
TUTTIFRUTTI didnt break the 100k Rule !Rockstar Inc wrote:imo it's not a case for the fairplaysection...more the technic part...maybe time to "reintroduce", next to the 100K rule, the "you can only have x "lowered price riders"![]()
Tutti is a good example how fucked up the system isworst case example how to spoil the fun for others...no offense to him personally...good old "don't hate the player, hate the game"
![]()
@100K-Rule...was discussed in the "Girl Power Case"...Leso was involved...rule in general not working since a few years already
Sorry
-
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Norimberga
- Contact:
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case

sure he sold a rider now...but i highly doubt he had no minus on his banc account before inscripting for his current race/races...
so please...kick your beloved sons ass and he can have a look why the 100k rule doesn't work and that it's fucking urgent to fix this problem
"I'm an old-school sprinter. I can't climb a mountain but if I am in front with 200 metres to go then there's nobody who can beat me.” Mark Cavendish, at the 2007 Eneco Tour
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
I asked him and he confirmed me the same thing. When he started the tour he was not under -100k.lesossies wrote:TUTTIFRUTTI didnt break the 100k Rule !Rockstar Inc wrote:imo it's not a case for the fairplaysection...more the technic part...maybe time to "reintroduce", next to the 100K rule, the "you can only have x "lowered price riders"![]()
Tutti is a good example how fucked up the system isworst case example how to spoil the fun for others...no offense to him personally...good old "don't hate the player, hate the game"
![]()
@100K-Rule...was discussed in the "Girl Power Case"...Leso was involved...rule in general not working since a few years already
Sorry
He bought his strong mountain power by selling some riders last week.
And he sold the climber to be able to play Andes.
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
I can see no bug and no bug using.
TUTTIFRUTTI has a 19M team with 9 riders .
If it is needed, we can search a solution against that.
A maximal financial inscription limit for the diffrerent races in dependance of category race, tour or other.
A transfer tax depending of the amount of rided races/period could limit the profit by buying/selling riders.
We can discuss about it.
TUTTIFRUTTI has a 19M team with 9 riders .
If it is needed, we can search a solution against that.
A maximal financial inscription limit for the diffrerent races in dependance of category race, tour or other.
A transfer tax depending of the amount of rided races/period could limit the profit by buying/selling riders.
We can discuss about it.
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
There's no problem in having a 19M 9 rider team.
Good thing we discussed it.
Good thing we discussed it.
Kraftsystemrevision! Include the distance!
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Got a carrot from FL. But they threaten to take it away now.
Basics reform: Give blue a chance!
Don't punish bugusers. We all have to use bugs, since most of them are declared as "features"!
Got a carrot from FL. But they threaten to take it away now.
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
Would be not bad, because I think that's this farming situation (see his transfer history at a time he was not riding) that allowed him to get more cash to invest in such team.A transfer tax depending of the amount of rided races/period could limit the profit by buying/selling riders.
We can discuss about it.
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
A maximal financial inscription limit for the diffrerent races in dependance of category race, tour or other.
Yep but maybe, up the salary cap for important races ( cat.6 375k --> 425k maybe etc... , same for GT) etc...
Yep but maybe, up the salary cap for important races ( cat.6 375k --> 425k maybe etc... , same for GT) etc...
[8:11:11 PM] SM: j'ai un bug la j'arrive plus a aller sur RFM
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
leso:
the problem here might be: RockstarInc:
cause it makes farming a super (but far too expensive) team very attractive - you ride this team to it´s "end" (everybody old) and reset it (or do whatever you want with it) - then you go on playing with the farm-team you farmed inbetween - and so on...
"the -100.000 = no inscription" rule can help here - we should have this working again. (we can discuss to make it -150.000 or -200.000) - but in general it´s better to have sth. like this working.
does anybody know if this rule active at the moment or not?
ah no... this is not the problem here (at last not for me) - neither it is a problem with Tutti or Tutti´s team (that´s why the thread indeed is wrong in fairness-area)A maximal financial inscription limit for the diffrerent races in dependance of category race, tour or other.
A transfer tax depending of the amount of rided races/period could limit the profit by buying/selling riders.
the problem here might be: RockstarInc:
is that right? if yes, that´s not good - that leads to farming and multi-teams imo.@100K-Rule...was discussed in the "Girl Power Case"...Leso was involved...rule in general not working since a few years already
cause it makes farming a super (but far too expensive) team very attractive - you ride this team to it´s "end" (everybody old) and reset it (or do whatever you want with it) - then you go on playing with the farm-team you farmed inbetween - and so on...
"the -100.000 = no inscription" rule can help here - we should have this working again. (we can discuss to make it -150.000 or -200.000) - but in general it´s better to have sth. like this working.
does anybody know if this rule active at the moment or not?
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
Its not active!does anybody know if this rule active at the moment or not?
-
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 11:15 am
- Contact:
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
Could we have a IP check TUTTIFRUTTI vs team belloz ?
TUTTIFRUTTI not riding anymore, new team: team belloz with exactly the same "behaviour".
TUTTIFRUTTI not riding anymore, new team: team belloz with exactly the same "behaviour".
Paris - Roubaix 2016
Milan - San Remo 2015
Tour de France 2013
4x French Champion 2017, 2018, 2020
GP E3 Harelbeke 2020
2x Paris - Tours 2013, 2019
Gand - Wevelgem 2018
Amstel 2015
Fleche Wallonne 2015
Milan - San Remo 2015
Tour de France 2013
4x French Champion 2017, 2018, 2020
GP E3 Harelbeke 2020
2x Paris - Tours 2013, 2019
Gand - Wevelgem 2018
Amstel 2015
Fleche Wallonne 2015
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
4 teams with same IP (TUTTIFRUTTI, team belloz and 2 others ) have been first banned until the problem has been clarified.
-
- Posts: 293
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2010 11:15 am
- Contact:
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
team belloz is riding the TOUR DE FRANCE ?
The Fairplay Committee agrees the fact that we can create several teams ? He is the multi of TUTTIFRUTTI and 2 other teams (4 in total).
Always buying strong teams just before Tour/classics and no problem ?
The Fairplay Committee agrees the fact that we can create several teams ? He is the multi of TUTTIFRUTTI and 2 other teams (4 in total).
Always buying strong teams just before Tour/classics and no problem ?
Paris - Roubaix 2016
Milan - San Remo 2015
Tour de France 2013
4x French Champion 2017, 2018, 2020
GP E3 Harelbeke 2020
2x Paris - Tours 2013, 2019
Gand - Wevelgem 2018
Amstel 2015
Fleche Wallonne 2015
Milan - San Remo 2015
Tour de France 2013
4x French Champion 2017, 2018, 2020
GP E3 Harelbeke 2020
2x Paris - Tours 2013, 2019
Gand - Wevelgem 2018
Amstel 2015
Fleche Wallonne 2015
-
- Posts: 1914
- Joined: Thu Feb 18, 2010 10:15 pm
- Location: Norimberga
- Contact:
Re: TUTTIFRUTTI case
the fpc doesn't agree...cause as far as i know only buh and leso got the rights to ban guys...fpc is only advising...sadly
"I'm an old-school sprinter. I can't climb a mountain but if I am in front with 200 metres to go then there's nobody who can beat me.” Mark Cavendish, at the 2007 Eneco Tour
Who is online
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests