teamattack 05.01.16 MgN-Redteam
Posted: Tue Jan 05, 2016 12:36 pm
10h one day race. 05.01.16
MgN-Redteam attacked with three riders at km 158 (18kms before the finish)
Km: 158, Steigung: 3
Lexi Hartmann (MgN-Redteam) attackiert
Jamal Bouaha (MgN-Redteam) attackiert
Tiago Ampolas (MgN-Redteam) attackiert
Luna Team Bike: ok
MgN-Redteam: last 20 km
Luna Team Bike: but is team attack ?
MgN-Redteam: Sorry for all of you
Wookie(FairPlay): I guess you will get a fine, nothing serious.
Luna Team Bike: It was wrong, but for me it's ok
MgN-Redteam: I saw guys attacking in 4 with 3 riders last 25km. you guys make your decision, i broke the rules, so make a fair the decision, look at the race and make the better
Wookie(FairPlay): Yes. This with 4% is also rule 3, attacking and/or hanging.
MgN-Redteam: if was in 4, it was a teamattack to?
Wookie(FairPlay): Shuld i make a thread so you can defend your position or make a statement?
MgN-Redteam: let me ask you something
MgN-Redteam: yes, for sure
Wookie(FairPlay): I guess so too, but you still broken the rules.
MgN-Redteam: nobody hanging on me in my attack, so the gap i won with attack, with 3 or 2 was the same... so the i think you can desqualify 1 of flat riders
Luna Team Bike: but for me isn't a problem
Luna Team Bike: rules are rules
Luna Team Bike: for you..
Bengals Udine: sure
MgN-Redteam: ok sorry, but i think, the win is not in question...
MgN-Redteam: oooh sorry
Wookie(FairPlay): After 655 races you should know that
Wookie(FairPlay): Last 20km is with hanging. Attacking is last 10km
Bengals Udine: and now ?
MgN-Redteam: last 20km
Wookie(FairPlay): Then it was a teamattack
Bengals Udine: yes
Wookie(FairPlay): Were the three MgN-Redteam (Hartmann, Bouhana and Ampolas) in the same group at km 158?
After 655 races he should know the rules. He won the race with Hartmann, but i think he would have won anyway. But still he should get a fine.
MgN-Redteam attacked with three riders at km 158 (18kms before the finish)
Km: 158, Steigung: 3
Lexi Hartmann (MgN-Redteam) attackiert
Jamal Bouaha (MgN-Redteam) attackiert
Tiago Ampolas (MgN-Redteam) attackiert
Luna Team Bike: ok
MgN-Redteam: last 20 km
Luna Team Bike: but is team attack ?
MgN-Redteam: Sorry for all of you
Wookie(FairPlay): I guess you will get a fine, nothing serious.
Luna Team Bike: It was wrong, but for me it's ok
MgN-Redteam: I saw guys attacking in 4 with 3 riders last 25km. you guys make your decision, i broke the rules, so make a fair the decision, look at the race and make the better
Wookie(FairPlay): Yes. This with 4% is also rule 3, attacking and/or hanging.
MgN-Redteam: if was in 4, it was a teamattack to?
Wookie(FairPlay): Shuld i make a thread so you can defend your position or make a statement?
MgN-Redteam: let me ask you something
MgN-Redteam: yes, for sure
Wookie(FairPlay): I guess so too, but you still broken the rules.
MgN-Redteam: nobody hanging on me in my attack, so the gap i won with attack, with 3 or 2 was the same... so the i think you can desqualify 1 of flat riders
Luna Team Bike: but for me isn't a problem
Luna Team Bike: rules are rules
Luna Team Bike: for you..
Bengals Udine: sure
MgN-Redteam: ok sorry, but i think, the win is not in question...
MgN-Redteam: oooh sorry
Wookie(FairPlay): After 655 races you should know that
Wookie(FairPlay): Last 20km is with hanging. Attacking is last 10km
Bengals Udine: and now ?
MgN-Redteam: last 20km
Wookie(FairPlay): Then it was a teamattack
Bengals Udine: yes
Wookie(FairPlay): Were the three MgN-Redteam (Hartmann, Bouhana and Ampolas) in the same group at km 158?
After 655 races he should know the rules. He won the race with Hartmann, but i think he would have won anyway. But still he should get a fine.