cycling4freaks.com

January 2017

http://www.cycling4freaks.com/radsport/january2017.pdf

17-22/1/17 Santos Tour Down Under 2.UWT
23-29/1/17 35 Vuelta Ciclista a la Provincia de San Juan 2.1 - Luq
26/1/17 Trofeo Porreres, Felanitx, Ses Salines, Campos 1.1
27/1/17 Trofeo Andratx-Mirador des Colomer 1.1
28/1/17 Trofeo Serra de Tramuntana 1.1
29/1/17 Trofeo Palma 1.1
29/1/17 Grand Prix Cycliste la Marseillaise 1.1
29/1/17 Cadel Evans Great Ocean Road Race 1.UWT
31/1/17 - 04/02/17 Dubai Tour 2.HC - Coro

ONLINE, MUST BE DRAWED OR CHECKED(WHEN PROFILE STILL THE SAME)
NOT ONLINE
NEW VERSION DRAWED
AT WORK
DELETE OR POSTPONED
SAME TRACK AS 2015

15.01 People's Choice Classic (Down Under Classic) same as last year.
29.01. Cadel Evans Great Ocean Road Race looks like the same as last year.

TDU Stage 1
Flat 145 Km


TDU Stage 2
Hilly 149 Km


TDU Stage 3
Flat 144 Km


TDU Stage 4
Flat 150 Km


TDU Stage 5
Hill 152 Km


TDU Stage 6
Flat 90 Km

TOUR DE PAVES 2017
BARBADOS

KZN Summer Series

Moscow Team Pro wrote:KZN Summer Series

I can´t find the KZN Summer Series in any calender...

La Iberica








REST DAY

From UCI Calendar: http://www.uci.ch/road/calendar/
17-22/1/17 Santos Tour Down Under 2.UWT
23-29/1/17 35 Vuelta Ciclista a la Provincia de San Juan 2.1
26/1/17 Trofeo Porreres, Felanitx, Ses Salines, Campos 1.1
27/1/17 Trofeo Andratx-Mirador des Colomer 1.1
28/1/17 Trofeo Serra de Tramuntana 1.1
29/1/17 Trofeo Palma 1.1
29/1/17 Cadel Evans Great Ocean Road Race 1.UWT
31/1/17 - 04/02/17 Dubai Tour 2.HC

I will do San Juan if nobody is drawing it.

I'll do Dubai tour if nobody is drawing it.

I do the Mallorca Trophy the next days

Trofeo Campos 26.01.17
Flat 167 Km
Mintakt Km 157




Trofeo Andratx 27.01.17
Hill Km 159
Mintakt Km 149




Trofeo Serra de Tramuntana 28.01.17
Hill 139 Km
Mintakt Km 110



Trofeo Palma 29.01.17
Flat 162 Km
Mintakt Km 152

Why is the Tour de Pave not starting at 9 January as in the calender preview but at 12 January? Can we have it back at 9 January please?

team fl wrote:Why is the Tour de Pave not starting at 9 January as in the calender preview but at 12 January? Can we have it back at 9 January please?

Pardon, fixed.

Excellent, now I have the wrong form

The problem of course is that it was online before before the season change, when I gave the form. So I used the races online. Maybe I wasn't the only one either. Wrong form? Not perfect really, but ok, can live with it.
But the problem is that possibly some of the guys riding Iberica thought they are able to ride both. Now it turns out they are stuck in Iberica. No pavé. Not good. But a fitting end to the 2016/2017 winter calendar.
Luques and Pokemon, making RSF great again, that kind of stuff.

Robyklebt wrote:Excellent, now I have the wrong form

The problem of course is that it was online before before the season change, when I gave the form. So I used the races online. Maybe I wasn't the only one either. Wrong form? Not perfect really, but ok, can live with it.
But the problem is that possibly some of the guys riding Iberica thought they are able to ride both. Now it turns out they are stuck in Iberica. No pavé. Not good. But a fitting end to the 2016/2017 winter calendar.
Luques and Pokemon, making RSF great again, that kind of stuff.

Hopefully we organized so that things like this won't happen again in the future. Sorry for the inconvenience.

Another protest about this travesty of a winter calendar:
14th: Adelaide-Adelaide. Designer RKL.

Here the post from the Robyfiles thread, 25. September 2012

Robyklebt wrote:More



Hill sprinters again, 9 riders, mintact from km 146

9 riders.
Why has this been changed to 8?

I expect to have a say about the races I designed. Of course would like to have them taken out of the calendar this winter, since I don't want to be part of the "organizing" of this catastrophic winter calender in any way. That was refused, ok, once you've uploaded them the men in charge (respectively the arrogant boy in charge this time) can use them any way he wants. Ok, makes sense otherwise if everybody starts demanding his races out on certain days etc.it gets complicated. No problem. (ok, small problem)
Whoever decided to change the number of riders to 8... change it back to 9, that's how this race was designed, not 8 or 7 or 10, NINE RIDERS. A designer designs a fantasy race, then IT WON'T BE CHANGED TO THE LIKING OF LESO, LUQUES, POKE or BUH or anybody else. Program it the way the designer designed it, or, even better,take it out of the calendar.

Robyklebt wrote: Whoever decided to change the number of riders to 8... change it back to 9, that's how this race was designed, not 8 or 7 or 10, NINE RIDERS. A designer designs a fantasy race, then IT WON'T BE CHANGED TO THE LIKING OF LESO, LUQUES, POKE or BUH or anybody else. Program it the way the designer designed it, or, even better,take it out of the calendar.

+1

Hunsrueck wrote:

Robyklebt wrote: Whoever decided to change the number of riders to 8... change it back to 9, that's how this race was designed, not 8 or 7 or 10, NINE RIDERS. A designer designs a fantasy race, then IT WON'T BE CHANGED TO THE LIKING OF LESO, LUQUES, POKE or BUH or anybody else. Program it the way the designer designed it, or, even better,take it out of the calendar.

+1

Unfortunately, happens lots of times that, that setting is bad setted or not setted at all, so it is common that during the insertion the calendar guy just puts what he thinks it should be. We will try to check it more carefully, but in case you see something "strange" just send a pm.

Why a PM? Would something be done then? With a post in the forum nothing happens obviously.

Robyklebt wrote:Why a PM? Would something be done then? With a post in the forum nothing happens obviously.

A PM is faster as I get a message in my email, would be even faster writing me on Skype

Something could happen if there are the technical conditions, that means there are no team inscripted for that race, in the case of Adelaide when I checked that some guys where already inscripted so nothing done.

luques wrote:Unfortunately, happens lots of times that, that setting is bad setted or not setted at all, so it is common that during the insertion the calendar guy just puts what he thinks it should be. We will try to check it more carefully, but in case you see something "strange" just send a pm.

Just checked and loaded it in the editor, it's set at 9 riders.

Which asshole changed it to 8 and why? Again, N O T acceptable.
At least an explanation is required. Who and why.

Robyklebt wrote:

luques wrote:Unfortunately, happens lots of times that, that setting is bad setted or not setted at all, so it is common that during the insertion the calendar guy just puts what he thinks it should be. We will try to check it more carefully, but in case you see something "strange" just send a pm.

Just checked and loaded it in the editor, it's set at 9 riders.

Which asshole changed it to 8 and why? Again, N O T acceptable.
At least an explanation is required. Who and why.

Again just make it present through PM or in the forum (but slower reaction). Especially if for you the number of riders is so important. As I already said there are thousands of races to choose so it may happen that who insert the race see the wrong line, forget and so on, I don't see a tragedy in it, if that is so important, again, just send a pm.

I wasn't asking a theoretical question why it could happen. I was asking why it DID. And eliminated the possiblity "not set" that you proposed as theoretical answer last time.

luques wrote: Especially if for you the number of riders is so important.

Actually it doesn't matter WHAT was changed, it matters THAT something was changed. There is no reason to change a fantasy race. Be it number of riders, minute tact, starting altitude, flag, name of designer, length, percentages or whatever else I might have forgotten. If a fantasy race isn't up to standard then don't program it. But NEVER change it. For real races a bit different obviously, if it's badly designed, yeah change it. As a matter of respect and manners including a discussion with the designer... But that's not what we're talking about here, here it's:
Fantasy race Adelaide-Adelaide changed. Why DID it happen. (NOT why could it happen)