cycling4freaks.com

http://www.cycling4freaks.com/radsport/august2012.pdf

01.08.2012 - 02.08.2012 Paris-Corrèze (2.1)
01.08.2012 - 05.08.2012 Vuelta a Burgos (2.HC)
06.08.2012 - 12.08.2012 ENECO TOUR
07.08.2012 - 12.08.2012 Tour of Utah (2.1)
07.08.2012 - 11.08.2012 Tour de l´Ain - La route du progrès (2.1)
11.08.2012 - 11.08.2012 G.P. Camaiore (1.1)
14.08.2012 - 14.08.2012 Tre Valli Varesine (1.HC)
14.08.2012 - 14.08.2012 CLASICA CICLISTA SAN SEBASTIAN
15.08.2012 - 26.08.2012 Volta a Portugal em Bicicleta (2.1)
15.08.2012 - 15.08.2012 Coppa Agostoni - giro della Brianza (1.1)
17.08.2012 - 17.08.2012 Dutch Food Valley Classic (1.1)
18.08.2012 - 09.09.2012 VUELTA A ESPAÑA 2012
19.08.2012 - 19.08.2012 Châteauroux Classic de l´Indre Trophée Fenioux (1.1)
19.08.2012 - 19.08.2012 VATTENFALL CYCLASSICS
20.08.2012 - 26.08.2012 USA Pro Cycling Challenge (2.HC)
21.08.2012 - 21.08.2012 GP Stad Zottegem (1.1)
22.08.2012 - 22.08.2012 Druivenkoers - Overijse (1.1)
22.08.2012 - 26.08.2012 Post Danmark Rundt - Tour of Denmark (2.HC)
23.08.2012 - 23.08.2012 GP Industria Commercio Artigianato Carnaghese (1.1)
25.08.2012 - 25.08.2012 Giro del Veneto (1.1)
26.08.2012 - 26.08.2012 Schaal Sels (1.1)
26.08.2012 - 26.08.2012 GP OUEST FRANCE - PLOUAY
31.08.2012 - 01.09.2012 Rotterdam-Antwerpen, Antwerpen-Rotterdam (2.1)

2012 ONLINE, MUST BE DRAWED OR CHECKED(WHEN PROFILE STILL THE SAME)
2012 NOT ONLINE
NEW VERSION DRAWED
AT WORK
DELETE OR POSTPONED
SAME TRACK AS 2011

RKL will design the Tour of Utah

I could try to do Paris Corrèze + Tour de l'Ain. But I probably won't have time to do much more.

The "emergency" is Vuelta, who's in for that ?

olmania wrote:The "emergency" is Vuelta, who's in for that ?

I look what I can do.

Today I start back to work in tour of Portugal!

Vuelta a Burgos 2.HC 1. - 5.8.

Volta a Portugal 2012


Prólogo
voltaportugalprologo_2012



Etapa 1
volta_a_portugal_etapa_1_2012



Etapa 2
volta_a_portugal_etapa_2_2012




Etapa 3
volta_a_portugal_etapa_3_2012




Etapa 4
volta_a_portugal_etapa_4_2012




Etapa 5
volta_a_portugal_etapa_5_2012



Etapa 6
volta_a_portugal_etapa_6_2012



Etapa 7
volta_a_portugal_etapa_7_2012



Etapa 8
volta_a_portugal_etapa_8_2012



Etapa 10 - ITT
volta_a_portugal_etapa_9_2012



Etapa 10
volta_a_portugal_etapa_10_2012

Antwerpse Havenpijl UCI 1.2 - zondag 5 augustus 2012


19.08. Vattenfall Cyclassics
Maybe I create the agegroup (Jedermann)-race..then i can ride the race i ride in reality that day

I've done this with the new editor, this should be ok. Check it leso please because I'm the specialist of the mistakes with the new editor

Vuelta Leon 7.-11.08.2012 2.2

GP Camaiore is the same as last year.

Bad news
I work a lot atm & I won't have time to draw tour de l'Ain,
I don't even have time to race with my team these days, so, no time at all for the design. Sorry

An admin can put the profiles online of the already designed tours please, because I have to go on holidays the 22 and I need to schedule my form settings for August (I'm back for Eneco and all the tours after)

Thanks

And Please Woddeltown, what are filenames of ENECo please

sylvainmeteo wrote:An admin can put the profiles online of the already designed tours please,

I´ll try but I cannot do it for all tours , The Vuelta is coming later

First Vuelta preview . Some stages will still change until start:

mmm... Well, want to open schedule discussion now. Thought the singe (or is he the klebt guy on the forum) but apprently he didn't). So easy proposal form gaurain : PLEASE, REDUCE the number of race per day... In order to have MORE splitted group (2 or 3) cause awfull at the moment, awfull.

Example, cross of Eneco/Utah, already 12 fields... As I know you, you will propose 6 or 7 editions of a 1 day race which means... 19 fields/day. Just too much I think, way too much. And easy example, I win money way too easy, don't even need to give a km tempo cause new teams are always part of group one and always doing for me... Furthermore, results, look how Mathe dominated Poland and Austria, look ho Elaska destroyed the opponents in Poland, look how easy I won Austria too... Well, I even don't need to search, surelyy there are much more examples... but it's way too easy at the moment, way too easy! And, field multiplication is I think one of the reason.

So proposal Gaurain :

Eneco : delete 19h! or furthermore (but then, I think nobody will speak to me anymore) : 9h - 14h - 19h - 22h
Utah/Ain : put 19h in place of 20-22 or furthermore : 10h - 16h - 21h - 24h

then, Vuelta :

10h - 14h (had no big tours this year) - 18h - 21h - 24h (but here, I think 24h with 2 big tours and 22 with only one, mm ok, kind of stupid proposal) just to say that I'm for 5 editions.

And Portugal : agressive one : 11h - 17h - 20h - 23h ... cool one : 11h - 15h - 18h - 20h - 23h
Lombarda : 9h - 15h - 19h - 22h ... cool one : add 24!

Gaurain, you are right on the money!
We have too much races for the actual amount of active teams. Lots of races with less than 10 teams, dominating teams in stage races like austria and poland. Leso, you can't please everybody... 6 editions of every single stage race, plus 6 editions of a GT (thats ok because its a GT) plus lots of one day races... thats too much imo.

Like Gaurain wrote, Eneco and Utah/L'Ain, each race with four editions should be enough. Burgos? We dont need Burgos with 6 editions imo. Portugal 6 times as well? NO! There are lots of special one day races (Agostini, Tre Valli, ...) at the same time, plus Vuelta, imo 3 times are enough (its just cat 2). Denmark and Limousin? Stage races limited for D6-7? If not, not more than 3 times please because of the one day races at this time.

Its just my opinion. But I hope that there are lots of teams which want to have a closer fight for glory. Sure, some people will have problems to ride all they want. But its the same for everybody. As I said, Leso cant please everybody.

I think (it's only my opinion) that for ENECO : 9, 13, 17, 21h are enough because flat tours isn't very popular in RSF and we should limite 8 teams or less fields and I think Utah or Ain 4 starts time is enough too

And probably the same for Danemark with parallel with Vuelta and Portugal (probably 6 start times for Vuelta and 4 or 5 for Portugal would be good too )


EDIT : what about to have the number of start times depends of the number of parallel tours?
For example : 6 start times if there's only 1 tour ; 5 start times if there's 2 parallel tours, and maybe 4 if there's 3 parellel tours (except GT)
and 5 start times for 1 day races and 6 for cat 4+

What is the opinion of the others

I think the situation at the moment is okay?! I mean, okay, there is maybe a little bit too big chance to make easy money, but more teams, more races. And the time... I really like it that there are a lot of starting times because not everyone can always ride when he wants it... and so everyone can involve the race in his individual day schedule.

2 middle mountain stages, 2 HC and 1 flat and the TTT.

Not sure about all the intermediates, sometimes they pass the same place twice, but only one sprint... so guessing. Same for one GPM. GPMs all the same, I put cat 3 like last year.

I adapted some times.
THe main line doesn´t change.
Leon will be for Div 6-8
http://www.cycling4freaks.com/radsport/august2012.pdf

the time trial is a TTT, I hope you made it right
For the last stage you can use the climbs profiles of last year (at least Menthières)

olmania wrote:the time trial is a TTT, I hope you made it right
For the last stage you can use the climbs profiles of last year (at least Menthières)

Yes TTT is made
And the last thing i want to it, but i didN't find the time today.