Re: April 2015
Posted: Tue Mar 31, 2015 5:04 pm
RVV in Leso's box... Last 50km's the same as last year... Small changes for the rest but nothing really important!
Hum maybe adapt the end of race leso, 4 lasts kms 1 1 -1 0 ?lesossies wrote: Paris Roubaix
Little changes are possible
OK, changed !Pokemon Club wrote: Hum maybe adapt the end of race leso, 4 lasts kms 1 1 -1 0 ?
AgreePokemon Club wrote:See RVV online remember one thing about some Paterberg complain after RVV 2014 race. Why not try Paterberg 5** instead of 7** ?
So for you it is normal to have 70-80 70 paves stronger than 6x-8x 8x paves in Paterberg ? It is maybe at 13% overall but only 360m and it always influence it too much things in favor of classics. Usually we say it after the race, for one time let's do something before the race.gaurain rx wrote:Disagree
In 2010 it was a +6:Pokemon Club wrote:So for you it is normal to have 70-80 70 paves stronger than 6x-8x 8x paves in Paterberg ? It is maybe at 13% overall but only 360m and it always influence it too much things in favor of classics. Usually we say it after the race, for one time let's do something before the race.gaurain rx wrote:Disagree
Agree with Idefix.. Rode there, that's way more dificult than one km of some of the ardenian classic climbs for example... Anyway, the % is in debate cause we don't exactly know how it affects stuffs in rsf + to answer to poke, in considering 60-80-80 should be stronger than 70-80-70 on Paterberg, you consider the first category kind of riders should be stronger than the second category... which is, imo, based on nothing but a "personal" preference or personal point of view.Idéfix wrote:Hey!
I don't care, I will miss RVV ( ), but as an RSF rider, 5 is really not enough, considering the 12,5% average and 20% max. I did Paterberg (on a real bike^^), and it's really more difficult than a whole pavé km at 5%, maybe it is even more difficult than a pavé km at 6%! So 6** seems quite ok, but 7** does not shock me.
Actually You mentioned it. viewtopic.php?f=15&t=67&start=75#p76774Robyklebt wrote:As a Donkey I have only impersonal points of view, so in my impersonal point of view the pavé could actually be harder for RVV. Something somebody else, most likely Gaurain, mentioned once. Since for RVV the "sidething" is closed by barriers, riders are forced to ride on the pavé, so for RVV only it could be ***. That was his personal view if I remember correctly, and actually now my impersonal one too.
For the rest: Impersonal Donkey really likes continuity. In a year. So have the same percentages and pavé for the same hills. Not 5** in Dwars, 7*** in E3, 6** in RVV etc. If it's 7** for E3, have it at 7** in RVV. Change it next year if it needs to be changed. Except for the barrier thing, which can make some of the pavé harder in RVV
Wrong, it is in debate because we rode enough races with this balance to know exactly how it worksgaurain rx wrote:Agree with Idefix.. Rode there, that's way more dificult than one km of some of the ardenian classic climbs for example... Anyway, the % is in debate cause we don't exactly know how it affects stuffs in rsf + to answer to poke, in considering 60-80-80 should be stronger than 70-80-70 on Paterberg, you consider the first category kind of riders should be stronger than the second category... which is, imo, based on nothing but a "personal" preference or personal point of view.Idéfix wrote:Hey!
I don't care, I will miss RVV ( ), but as an RSF rider, 5 is really not enough, considering the 12,5% average and 20% max. I did Paterberg (on a real bike^^), and it's really more difficult than a whole pavé km at 5%, maybe it is even more difficult than a pavé km at 6%! So 6** seems quite ok, but 7** does not shock me.
If you say so but you skip the main pointPokemon Club wrote:Wrong, it is in debate because we rode enough races with this balance to know exactly how it worksgaurain rx wrote:Agree with Idefix.. Rode there, that's way more dificult than one km of some of the ardenian classic climbs for example... Anyway, the % is in debate cause we don't exactly know how it affects stuffs in rsf + to answer to poke, in considering 60-80-80 should be stronger than 70-80-70 on Paterberg, you consider the first category kind of riders should be stronger than the second category... which is, imo, based on nothing but a "personal" preference or personal point of view.Idéfix wrote:Hey!
I don't care, I will miss RVV ( ), but as an RSF rider, 5 is really not enough, considering the 12,5% average and 20% max. I did Paterberg (on a real bike^^), and it's really more difficult than a whole pavé km at 5%, maybe it is even more difficult than a pavé km at 6%! So 6** seems quite ok, but 7** does not shock me.
The same for you no ? Anyway, for me it is simple, hilly paves should be normally a question of "strengh" and not of "jump", in that case the hilly influence is clearly too much for Paterberg ( and for hilly paves in general), or we adapt it wronglygaurain rx wrote:If you say so but you skip the main pointPokemon Club wrote:Wrong, it is in debate because we rode enough races with this balance to know exactly how it worksgaurain rx wrote:Agree with Idefix.. Rode there, that's way more dificult than one km of some of the ardenian classic climbs for example... Anyway, the % is in debate cause we don't exactly know how it affects stuffs in rsf + to answer to poke, in considering 60-80-80 should be stronger than 70-80-70 on Paterberg, you consider the first category kind of riders should be stronger than the second category... which is, imo, based on nothing but a "personal" preference or personal point of view.Idéfix wrote:Hey!
I don't care, I will miss RVV ( ), but as an RSF rider, 5 is really not enough, considering the 12,5% average and 20% max. I did Paterberg (on a real bike^^), and it's really more difficult than a whole pavé km at 5%, maybe it is even more difficult than a pavé km at 6%! So 6** seems quite ok, but 7** does not shock me.
No, José Samyn.Robyklebt wrote:Claude Criquelion.
but it isn't because he has a good jump only that he could win it, after I don't know, I didn't see his win, too old for meRobyklebt wrote:Do I really have to explain everything?
Criquielion won RVV. And he was definetly a JUMP guy.
saw that couple of years ago, Boogerd was on the top 3 at the top of Muur van geraardsbergen with bettini almost in the wheel ^^Pokemon Club wrote:but it isn't because he has a good jump only that he could win it, after I don't know, I didn't see his win, too old for meRobyklebt wrote:Do I really have to explain everything?
Criquielion won RVV. And he was definetly a JUMP guy.
Hahagaurain rx wrote:saw that couple of years ago, Boogerd was on the top 3 at the top of Muur van geraardsbergen with bettini almost in the wheel ^^Pokemon Club wrote:but it isn't because he has a good jump only that he could win it, after I don't know, I didn't see his win, too old for meRobyklebt wrote:Do I really have to explain everything?
Criquielion won RVV. And he was definetly a JUMP guy.