Page 2 of 5

Re: February 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:20 pm
by sylvainmeteo
Agree with the 20 or 21h argument, when I have school, this 2 times are the only ones which I can ride
it should be good to have 20 or 21h in all the tours ;)

Re: February 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:33 pm
by Robyklebt
Then you don't agree, because I just said that those 2 times should lose some tours too. Everybody bites in the apple. Enough with "let's have less tours", oh, "one less for the afternoon sounds good". Less tours? Everyone. Or no thanks, enough of hitting on the afternoon.

Re: February 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 4:55 pm
by Robyklebt
Ups, obviously made a mess of percentages before.. .afternoon has 37,5 of all non-offered tours that are planned with a time for february.
It has only 57% of the the 7 tours with time available.
Evening 71%, the rest 85%.

Less tours, I expect us poor afternoon boys to go down to 42% and all the others at 71% or something .In case my point isn't clear yet, fuck that. No to less tours under the current circumstances.

Re: February 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 5:35 pm
by Lizard
Robyklebt wrote:Ups, obviously made a mess of percentages before.. .afternoon has 37,5 of all non-offered tours that are planned with a time for february.
It has only 57% of the the 7 tours with time available.
Evening 71%, the rest 85%.

Less tours, I expect us poor afternoon boys to go down to 42% and all the others at 71% or something .In case my point isn't clear yet, fuck that. No to less tours under the current circumstances.
Word! Equality, dudes.

Re: February 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 16, 2012 8:09 pm
by NoPikouze
One of the main questions (for Buhman I mean) is Tours for everybody VS Money for everybody. MEaning quantity vs quality. Races for everybody vs strong groups.
Someone has to decide whether there should be MANY TOURS WITH LESS MONEY or on the opposite LESS TOURS WITH (a bit) MORE MONEY.
After that, you can decide of a schedule.

But currently there are much tours with much (easy) money, that's not so good. Especially with this auction system, we might see more and more strange things.

Re: February 2012

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:10 pm
by lesossies
Robyklebt wrote:7 tours with times in the pdf

The morning (9-11) has 6
The afternoon (14-16) has 4
The early evening (17-19) has 6
The evening (20-21) has 5
The late evening (22-24) has 6

I guess it's too late to change anything.
We can change all that we want, its why I proposed to discuss it so early .

Re: February 2012

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 1:26 pm
by bergwerk cycling
so change it ...

Re: February 2012

Posted: Wed Jan 18, 2012 8:25 pm
by auxilium torino
05 Feb Trofeo Palma de Mallorca Esp 1.1 -
06 Feb Trofeo Migjorn (was Trofeo Cala Millor-Cala Millor) Esp 1.1 -
07 Feb Trofeo Deià (was Trofeo Inca) Esp 1.1 -
08 Feb Trofeo final (was Trophée Deià) Esp 1.1 -
09 Feb Trofeo Magaluf-Palmanova Esp 1.1 - DELETE

Please, let the old name for RSF palmares

This year only 4 race, last would be delete

Re: February 2012

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 10:51 am
by lesossies
adapted Preview:
http://www.radsportfreaks.com/radsport/february2012.pdf

The morning (9-11) has 6
13h has 1
The afternoon (14-16) has 6
The early evening (17-18) has 5
19h has 2
The evening (20-21) has 4
The late evening (22-23) has 6
24h has 1

I I look this way, one should move from 22-23 to 20-21 but I dont see which one.
If I look the calendar, specially the times with 2 or 3 parallel tours, I find it is a good mix.

Re: February 2012

Posted: Thu Jan 19, 2012 2:17 pm
by Robyklebt
Now the afternoon is happy.
But fairly sure the evening 20-21 isn't....

Why give Qatar-Algarve-Sardegna the identical times from 16h on? Yes, makes sense to give the 3 similar times, but doesn't have to be the same exactly I think.
16-19-22 Q
15-18-21 A
16-20-23 S

It's a 1h change in each time, "crosses" the borders twice. But gives different people the chance to ride, while only changing one hour.
But actually you would need to consider haut Var, that somebody is designing I think (think read something somewhere) too... it's going to be in, better plan directly with that one too.

Re: February 2012

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:06 pm
by olmania
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

This short TT to end the tour makes a big difference compared to the past years.

Re: February 2012

Posted: Sat Jan 21, 2012 7:23 pm
by olmania
26th, Boucles du Sud Ardèche, should be the same profile than last years. I remember that I did it once, but I can't find it (maybe not put in the calendar in 2011 by leso ?).

What about this tour in South Africa ... original ? You will say "season starts, we don't care about these minus races ..." ok, well I was just saying ! http://www.tourofsa.co.za/index.php?mod ... &stageID=1

Re: February 2012

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:47 pm
by auxilium torino
nice, afternoon is happy..but why not tour on 8 hour morning, and why 24 hours only a shit tour like Oman(if is to draw, while the info are not good)?no right for othe players?

Re: February 2012

Posted: Sun Jan 22, 2012 11:54 pm
by olmania
auxilium torino wrote:nice, afternoon is happy..but why not tour on 8 hour morning, and why 24 hours only a shit tour like Oman(if is to draw, while the info are not good)?no right for othe players?
Bring 3 more thousands people on RSF, and we will plat every hour between 7am to 1pm ! ;)

Re: February 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:13 am
by auxilium torino
OL, i say since more time, spain and portugal, but italian too playng later then german and french...

Re: February 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 12:58 am
by olmania
auxilium torino wrote:OL, i say since more time, spain and portugal, but italian too playng later then german and french...
No one have to wake up at 6-7-8am in Italy, of course.
And I never go to bed at 3-4-5am ... of course.

Re: February 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 2:44 am
by auxilium torino
:roll:

Image
Image
Image
Image
Image
Image

i put 8 riders pro teams, like real race

Re: February 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 4:38 am
by Rockstar Inc
auxilium torino wrote:i put 8 riders pro teams, like real race
as it was decided to reduce the squads ingame...it was said too, that we take real number + one to compensate the one legged leaders...

Re: February 2012

Posted: Mon Jan 23, 2012 9:05 am
by Robyklebt
You can add Tour med btw. Will take place after all. 08.02.-12.02. Put it one day earlier ok to have a free day for the NCs.
And then you can happily redo some of the times :D

Re: February 2012

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 12:58 am
by auxilium torino
Team Franconia wrote:
auxilium torino wrote:i put 8 riders pro teams, like real race
as it was decided to reduce the squads ingame...it was said too, that we take real number + one to compensate the one legged leaders...
all stage are 120 to 160 km. all flat, and all teams ride for Sprint ...

Re: February 2012

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:10 am
by Rockstar Inc
so what?`because the profile is easier it's ok to overrule old decisions without discussion?

Re: February 2012

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 1:19 am
by NoPikouze
I think it wasnt exactly that way. More +1 for important races like cat 5-6.
Well actually i'm not sure there is any rule at all since its never followed anyway !

Re: February 2012

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:33 pm
by auxilium torino
05 Feb Trofeo Palma de Mallorca Esp 1.1
Image

Re: February 2012

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 8:37 pm
by Robyklebt
I still don't think it's a good idea to give 20-21 less tours than all other times. They are the nr 1 times as far as I now. Yep, don't give them everything and all, let them occasionnally have to move to 19 and 22 too... but like the newest preview looks is too anti-20-21 somehow.

Re: February 2012

Posted: Tue Jan 24, 2012 9:05 pm
by NoPikouze
Hmmm just some thinking at this point.

There are 9 tours programmed (counting Tour Med and not calabria, I'm not sure what that is). Let's go for 9 for the example.
Every "period" should get how much... 8? 9? 7? (what is a period anyway ?) (1 less for the afternoon because they suck anyway ?)
Let's say 8...

Morning 8. How would you spread it ?
I think something like:
10h - 4/5/6
9h - 1/2
11h - 1/2
8h - I'm really not a fan :P

Do the same for all the periods. Then give every time of each period to a tour. But with consideration of certain uniqueness, such as algarve, which is in portugal, that should be ridden a bit later because portuguese people will probably enjoy riding it.

Actually I'm not sure if this makes anything more simple :lol: :lol:

But since people here seem to reason in periods, start the whole thing from that side instead of what is the actual aproach.

Afternoon:
14h - 2
15h - 3
16h - 2

Early evening:
17h - 2
18h - 3/4
19h - 2/3

Evening:
20h - 4
21h - 4

Late evening:
22h - 4/5
23h - 2/3
24h - 2

You can also add a separate 12-13h period (with less races in that case imo), and a 24h. This is of course open for discussion.

Give every tour a number (1 to 9). Write EVERY time-edition in a file and make a random function which gives to every 22h a 1 to 9 number.
Then you have to correct it for the specificity (portugal for example), and also to avoid 19h + 20h tours, which would be a bit silly with big gaps before and after it.
And after all, there can be a discussion about the periods, the number of editions at every time, the corrections you make. But at least there would be some kind of fix scheme behind it, and something to refer to.


Ignore this if it doesnt make sense, I dont know. Just tried to write a quick something.