cycling4freaks.com

Robyklebt wrote:Brabant there

saved under brabant10 (like the old version but for once I was too lazy to think of a new name plus I hope you have the 09 version that is there now saved under something else too..



Pavé there too, iBan said just put *, that's what I did. Hope is more or less ok, not really a belgium specialist...

* = so, it's pavé of city ? All the *, easy pavé ?
We maybe can ask Aywaille for these streets, it can change a lot of things ...

Giro del Trentino

Tappa 1: Riva del Garda - Torbole sul Garda
saved as 2010trentino01



Weather: South West Cont. Spring
Name of Tour: Giro del Trentino
Type: ITT

They are all in a village, as far as I can remember. What *? No clue... no info about anything. But less than one km anyway, so * seemed ok. Somebody finds better info, good, then we should change it.

Robyklebt wrote:They are all in a village, as far as I can remember. What *? No clue... no info about anything. But less than one km anyway, so * seemed ok. Somebody finds better info, good, then we should change it.

No info, but with the satellite view and the name of the street i saw a long pavé street in a village.
I can refind the name of this village if you want, but this evening, because now i've to go.
But that's only * = pavé of city, we don't care, only * ^^ i can change it if you want that's no important at all

Tappa 3: Fiera di Primiero - Trento
saved as 2010trentino03



Type: Middl. Mountain (?)

Tappa 4: Arco - Alpe di Pampeago
saved as 2010trentino04



Type: HC Mountain

I had some problems with the gps-file. There the distance was just 164km and the roadbook says 172km. So I had to fix the profile of the gps-file with help of the roadbook and the other pdf-file which was given. For the final climb I took the help of cyclingcols.com. If anybody thinks that there is a mistake in the designed profile please tell me so that I can fix it right.

Good job !
Now, leso can put it in the calendar

Idiotic ASO, they have EVERYTHING online and accessible, but they just haven't linked it. All you need to do is take the 2009 links and change the year in the URLs.

http://www.letour.fr/2010/LBL/COURSE/fr ... cours.html
http://www.letour.fr/2010/FWH/COURSE/fr ... cours.html

Morons...

Ras-le-cul d'internet! Rhaaaaa it make me beter, sorry for bad words in french about the web.

I was making the new Amstel profile and the window has closed. I make it tomorrow, i don't want to make it again today. But who want can see the difficulties (here: viewtopic.php?f=15&t=67&start=25) and the adaptation that i want make for RSF. If you see an error or something bad, don't hesitate to say it!

See you!

Hum , i my opinion there are not enough races for this April

Beuark, they have changed the final of LBL... It sucks!! Ok, the 40 last km are the same but before it changes... I can do the changes with Aywaille (sure it's the race he wants the more to do)... And Flêche Wallone changes too and I can do it too!

Was waiting to see you tomorrow to speak about this.

Of course we can make LBL both, there is no problem for me. I agree about the new profile: it suck (and they want maybe kill La Redoute next year ). But if Phil win, i agree (except for La Redoute!).

For La Flèche you can make all the race alone if you want (i maked a lot with the Flandrians). I can make it alone too, or we can make the race both. As you want.

For the Amstel it's finish tomorrow. Just the profile is missing now.

Romandie finally online.

Roby will design.

Here come the Amstel Gold Race 2010.



Normally it's ok. I receive no answer when I published the data, so I think everyone agrees.

If there is a small mistake, please thanks the managers who disturbed me a lot for nothing during the creation.

First 3 stages, rest tomorrow probably.






Very hilly..few GPMs, there easily could be more



The GPM 1 km later so that the pavé is there too. last year was **7 4... this year **11 1... so the GPM after 1 not really perfect, but I think better than split the 11 into 7 4 Except that no real difficulty in the last 100 km.

TT, hilly



HC stage, end not really that hard though...7 6 then down. or 6 7 ? Or 6 5? Don't remember, something like that.



Most idiotic stage of all times. Do it the other way around you idiots. 8 9 10 10 11 10 10 7 9 2 -6 -10 -10 -12 -12 -10 -11 -10 -5 follwed by 11 flat km... bah.. ok, real pros can ride flat unlike our RSF climbers

La flêche is done. Here are the changes with Iban profile (instead, the race has change a bit

Changes with Iban :

- They don’t really take the foot of Peu d’eau (km 106). So it seems less difficult in my version. 5/1/6 becomes only 4/5 (the begin of the kilometer change anyway too )
- Cote Haut Bois : 8 for Iban, 3/6 for me. Seems more logical from where I take the hill begin!
- For Groynne. No sieb Km. The max Slope average on a km wherever the km start is 5! So for me, no sieb km here!
- Bohisseau/Bousalle : 6/3/-3/3/7 Iban, 7/2/-2/3/6 : Seems clear. First km Bohisseau is a 7. Then 2 is ok to fit with the real profile and Iban. For Bousalle, the max slope average on a km wherever the km start is 5,4/5,5! Hesitate to put 6. Made it to respect the “spirit of the race”. Then, -3 downhill is logicall to made it fit (-1 was better normally).
- Ben Ahin : Iban 7/6, Gaurain 8/5. Can discuss a lot about it. Strictly, 8/6 seems right, maybe a bit harder but right. The 8 is. Anyway, Rsf effect is different than in real race. Can here make the second kilometer harder than it is in real cause it will be harder for the real riders to ride the second km uphill. But anyway, these discussions seems too dangerous, not clear rules, so I prefer to do 8/5
- Ereffe : 7/6 Iban, 7/4 Gaurain. There’s one km at 7% in the middle of the hill. Then, take the rest of the hill (begin and end) to do the second km. Watch the Iban % too. Seems the best to reproduce the difficult of this hill.
- Mur Huy : The same for both. Not really the real truth but it’s on the rsf spirit!.

And now, Luik - Bastonaken - Luik



The final has change. All the hills are the same with the one of 2009. We had discuss a lot of these. Only Maquisard and Rosier changes cause the foot is not at the same place!

And Haute Levee disappears replaced by Mont Theux. Put it 4-2-9 I think... It fits good with the realityy (and I know this hill well too)!

Ah yeah... And Minutentakt is at 135 for Fleche and 178 for LBL (maybe we can change it)!

Gaurain thinks he has done a mistake in LBL between Rosier and Mont Theux. Must be harder. Will check it this evening!

gaurain rx wrote:Ah yeah... And Minutentakt is at 135 for Fleche and 178 for LBL (maybe we can change it)!

yes please for LBL, minute tact from Cote de Wanne, again, please. Was good last year.

Cerro Torre RT wrote:

gaurain rx wrote:Ah yeah... And Minutentakt is at 135 for Fleche and 178 for LBL (maybe we can change it)!

yes please for LBL, minute tact from Cote de Wanne, again, please. Was good last year.

Wanne is at km 157!!! And Leso had change the minute tact at km 208!!!

Ok. I've just change my mistake right now. The new profile is this one. Only changes are between km 197 and 206. I had completly made bad the Vecquee. Ok, they don't climb it all like in the past but they do a part of it! Anyway, don't know how I did such a mistake!!

Former profile : 3/4/-3/-4/2/-2/-2/0/-1/-1
New profile : 3/7/4/-6/-3/-1/-2/-3/-2/-1

208 too late, way too late. 157 is still my favourite.