Page 6 of 6

Re: April 2012

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:01 pm
by NoPikouze
I'm inclined to prefer 6% because the flat-power has more importance, which is also the case for the real race on such a climb. But that's all I know.

Re: April 2012

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:18 pm
by Bear
That's a good point. I didn't think about that. Problem with 6% is that we will have 30-rider-groups to sprint for the victory. Don't if everyone think thats a problem.

Re: April 2012

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:31 pm
by Radunion
Personally I would keep the profile as close as possible to reality. It is unfortunate that our classics riders and climbers differ so much from real life riders (no impact of the length of climb, huge flat differences), but this is no reason to chance profiles. If there is a climb at the end and in the RSF physics this favours the climbers, than let the climbers win. If you want something different discuss about changing the physics and not the profiles.

The current situation (on 6-2 or 6-1) that the climbers gain time and than get caught from classics riders is definitely not what we see in reality.

Re: April 2012

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 7:43 pm
by olmania
Auxi, can you change the % in the summit arrivals on Giro Del Trentino

Stage 3:
http://d24w6bsrhbeh9d.cloudfront.net/ph ... 6_460s.jpg
Should be : 6/12/17/17/17/16/14/7/3/-14/2 (not many differences, but the 14/18 part is wrong imo on your design; the last 2500m could be different than what I propose).

Stage4:
km169 is 5% and km176 is 6%

I also could discussed your interpretation on stage2 ... but I am bored. (and look at this : http://www.climbbybike.com/profile.asp? ... ainID=2922 even if you have to adapt it because of the km in downhill after the town, the profile is different than the one you made).
Anyway, thanks for the work, this message was only here to tell you to be meticulous when you have really accurate informations about the profiles and the climbs like here, on the Giro Del Trentino ;)

Re: April 2012

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 8:59 pm
by gaurain rx
Can we please see the result of Amstel of former years? They are not available on the calendar of April 2011... I'm quite unsure we gets that often a bunch sprint of 30 guys.

+... I highly disagree with Radunion.

Re: April 2012

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:10 pm
by Bambel
Just a Question:

Isn't it possible to create S-Intermediates on -X km?

Because on Romandie the official S are always like 4 km earlier - while/at the end of downhill-parts.
And on the stages at forum it's always after some flat km, almost on +X.

I'm newbie, just curious about it :P

Re: April 2012

Posted: Thu Apr 12, 2012 11:21 pm
by olmania
Bambel wrote:Just a Question:

Isn't it possible to create S-Intermediates on -X km?

Because on Romandie the official S are always like 4 km earlier - while/at the end of downhill-parts.
And on the stages at forum it's always after some flat km, almost on +X.

I'm newbie, just curious about it :P
I had some problems with 2 stages. The stages were shorter when I designed it compared to the roadbook, that's why there are few differences.
If you want me to change the SI position, tell me where. But I don't think this will change the race thing on RSF ;)

Re: April 2012

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 7:05 am
by Bear
gaurain rx wrote:Can we please see the result of Amstel of former years? They are not available on the calendar of April 2011... I'm quite unsure we gets that often a bunch sprint of 30 guys.

+... I highly disagree with Radunion.
It's just my feeling of the last time I was riding AGR. ZL's climber won in a sprint, and there were at least 20 riders in this group.

Re: April 2012

Posted: Fri Apr 13, 2012 6:14 pm
by Bear
I just realized it's 6-2 again. I'm fine with that because it doesn't influence the form settings. But for next year we should discuss that again because 7-2 or whatever are good possibilities as well. And i would like to know why its 6-2 again.

Re: April 2012

Posted: Sat Apr 14, 2012 1:37 am
by Woddeltown Team
Giro delle Regioni and GP Herning cancelled

Re: April 2012

Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 12:26 pm
by team fl
What happened to LBL? It's in two days...

Re: April 2012

Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 1:39 pm
by olmania
team fl wrote:What happened to LBL? It's in two days...
Gaurain is working on it I guess

Re: April 2012

Posted: Fri Apr 20, 2012 3:29 pm
by gaurain rx
I have finished the draw on tuesday I think. I dunno what leso is waiting for ^^

I was waiting because I dont see any new LBL on the server :(

Re: April 2012

Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 1:48 am
by gaurain rx
LESO, IS THIS A JOKE?????????????????

Re: April 2012

Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 9:14 pm
by gaurain rx
LESO, BUHMANN... lblg.c4f

THINK ABOUT IT... FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAST!

Re: April 2012

Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:09 pm
by lesossies
gaurain rx wrote:LESO, BUHMANN... lblg.c4f

THINK ABOUT IT... FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAST!
should be now OK.

Re: April 2012

Posted: Sat Apr 21, 2012 10:17 pm
by gaurain rx
lesossies wrote:
gaurain rx wrote:LESO, BUHMANN... lblg.c4f

THINK ABOUT IT... FAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAAST!
should be now OK.
Cool, thanks... I hope I wasn't too agressive. Was just scared... Anyway, mintakt should be kept as you did... 208. Wouldn't be nice to change the lenght of the race the evening before it ^^

Thanks for your work and sorry for the mess!