December 2025

[Tukhtahuaev]

I did use the event tag. But I think I forgot at first and only added it later after I already saved it once

[Gipfelstuermer]

Final PDF.

No big changes. Just some of the times around Christmas.

[Robyklebt]

I updated BVI 18 instead 21, KohKong 10 instead 8, pavés de Noel and Tour de Herne starting 11 instead of 8.

No big changes. Just some of the times around Christmas.

[Robyklebt]

Alaska Cycling Cup in DECEMBER????

[cataracs]

Alaska Cycling Cup in DECEMBER????

Blame my bot mode It'll be around -8°C with only 50% chance of snow, not that bad...

[Alkworld]

Alaska Cycling Cup in DECEMBER????

Blame my bot mode It'll be around -8°C with only 50% chance of snow, not that bad...

It'll also be pretty dark that day. My team won't start there due to safety concerns ...

[Robyklebt]

I updated BVI 18 instead 21, KohKong 10 instead 8, pavés de Noel and Tour de Herne starting 11 instead of 8.

No big changes. Just some of the times around Christmas.

Got no anwer to this. Either Gipfel or Taka could have...communication.... Now we have the situation where the "final PDF" says one thing, the calendar something else. British starting tomorrow, 10-21 in the PDF, 10-18 in calendar, inscription. As Taka had announced on the 26th. My question was on the 29th (ok, my time, evening 28th for you all) So 2 days no clarity somehow, what counts? In the past (under Luques) the PDF was "sacred", what's written there is what we do. Not any more, I get that, but clarity should still be a goal. So, apart from the probable communication failure between Gipfel and Taka (can happen) here then at least one of you 2 could have used those 2 days to clarify what the plan was here. Now it's clear, no more need, changing it now to what the PDF says 1 day before... weird. Same for KohKong really. 8-15-21, ingame it's 10-15-21. For some people might make a difference, read here on the 28th in the final PDF one time, now it's another, can't ride anymore. At least clarify when the question is asked in the forum. You saw it, you decided not to answer for unclear reason in one case, pretty clear reasons in the other one. In the end WHAT the decision was is less important than actually giving us the correct, and not conflicting information.

[cataracs]

Sorry, you're right, I forgot to answer. It should be the same as the final PDF, Gip just missed those changes then forgot to edit. When I got the OK for the change I just "published" ingame, forgot about your question here.

[cataracs]

for Pavés de Noel, after checking the races since 2018, I decided this one is ok, it's better for pavés riders than the races offered in 2018/2020/2021/2022. so maybe it was never meant to be a pure pavés race. that's one reason, but the main reason is I couldn't find any race besides this one. Was going to design one myslef but then found this Hallelujah Trail and was ok with it for noel.

[team fl]

for Pavés de Noel, after checking the races since 2018, I decided this one is ok, it's better for pavés riders than the races offered in 2018/2020/2021/2022. so maybe it was never meant to be a pure pavés race. that's one reason, but the main reason is I couldn't find any race besides this one. Was going to design one myslef but then found this Hallelujah Trail and was ok with it for noel.

I've been complaining about that ever since

This race choice is a mockery of the Pavés de Noel...

[Robyklebt]

Well, but when there is no choice...
The race early this month, Trofeo Presa Allende, was a c4f off season classic, so can't really be used as Pavés de Noël.
Solution was to ask Takashi for some designs

[team fl]

Well, but when there is no choice...
The race early this month, Trofeo Presa Allende, was a c4f off season classic, so can't really be used as Pavés de Noël.
Solution was to ask Takashi for some designs

I still have a bone to pick with that lazy bastard anyway...