July 2025

[Gipfelstuermer]

Preview PDF
July 2025

Races to be designed:
Tour de France >>> see Thread
Sibiu Cycling Tour
Tour of Austria >>> Schartner
Ethias-Tour de Wallonie
Clásica Terres de l´Ebre

Races to be checked:
Trofeo Citta di Brescia
Midden-Brabant Poort Omloop
Visegrad 4 Bicycle Race - GP Hungary
Visegrad 4 Bicycle Race - GP Slovakia
Visegrad 4 Bicycle Race - GP Czechia
Visegrad 4 Bicycle Race - GP Poland
Prueba Villafranca - Ordiziako Klasika
Vuelta a Castilla y Leon

Legend
BLUE = Designer found
GREEN = DONE

[Robyklebt]

Time for Radunion and his check!

[Radunion]

calendar_7.png (32.1 KiB) Viewed 722 times

Not much to say for July. I do not expect anybody to be interested in riding the Chinese thing. Only a minor question: do we want to make a habit of riding 1.2 races if there is no other one-day race on this day, and someone is willing and able to design it?

[Radunion]

Tour times should be discussed too. I understand 20 h is hard to do with 4 additions, but it misses out again. If you do not want the same times as last year, also 22 h should be avoided.

[Schartner Bombe]

Tour of Austria 2025

St1: 167 km
mintact km 145


St2: 141 km
mintact km 120


St3: 143 km
mintact km 123


St4: 117 km
mintact km 94


St5: 144 km
mintact km 120

[bergwerk cycling]

Im Kalender 4 Tage ... Bombes Tour hat 5 Tage ... Eins stimmt nicht!?!

[drei.zehn]

Last year we had 5 starting times for TdF.
Why back to 4 again this year?

[Chemnitz Pro Cycling Team]

One Austria time in the morning would be great, or at least 13h

[bergwerk cycling]

One Austria time in the morning would be great, or at least 13h

Austria in the afternoon 14/15 would be good! At least 13 ok for me too

[flockmastoR]

One Austria time in the morning would be great, or at least 13h

Austria in the afternoon 14/15 would be good! At least 13 ok for me too

Support this claim!

[bergwerk cycling]

One Austria time in the morning would be great, or at least 13h

Austria in the afternoon 14/15 would be good! At least 13 ok for me too

correction from my side ... at least i cant ride not tour in July

but the preview calender is wrong ... Tour de Austria started one day earlier and have 5 days!

[Robyklebt]

Tour of Austria 2025

St1: 167 km
mintact km 145


St2: 141 km
mintact km 120


St3: 143 km
mintact km 123


St4: 117 km
mintact km 94


St5: 144 km
mintact km 120

The naming.

Last year's naming was better. Tour of Austria, not TOA. As for the 25, no need. We know it's 25. If it ends as a palmares entry the date will be right next to it. Cut the 25.

[Schartner Bombe]

Tour of Austria 2025

St1: 167 km
mintact km 145


St2: 141 km
mintact km 120


St3: 143 km
mintact km 123


St4: 117 km
mintact km 94


St5: 144 km
mintact km 120

The naming.

Last year's naming was better. Tour of Austria, not TOA. As for the 25, no need. We know it's 25. If it ends as a palmares entry the date will be right next to it. Cut the 25.

Changed it. Good Idea. Dont know why I did that. think because of this long name problem in editor or so ...

[Robyklebt]

The ** pavé for the 300 meters of pavé is interesting to say the least.

[Schartner Bombe]

The ** pavé for the 300 meters of pavé is interesting to say the least.

Yes, for someone who doesn't know the surface in reality and only sees it on the internet, that may be the case. I will have a look on it again …

[Robyklebt]

The ** pavé for the 300 meters of pavé is interesting to say the least.

Yes, for someone who doesn't know the surface in reality and only sees it on the internet, that may be the case.

Well, 300meters of pavé at ** means that if it was a full km it would be ******. Harder than the worst pavé on the way to Roubaix!
So it might be ** for somebody who knows the surface in reality, but lacks the thinking capability to use that knowledge for a sensible interpretation.

[Schartner Bombe]

The ** pavé for the 300 meters of pavé is interesting to say the least.

Yes, for someone who doesn't know the surface in reality and only sees it on the internet, that may be the case.

Well, 300meters of pavé at ** means that if it was a full km it would be ******. Harder than the worst pavé on the way to Roubaix!
So it might be ** for somebody who knows the surface in reality, but lacks the thinking capability to use that knowledge for a sensible interpretation.

1. My opinion was that in rsf, we only ride 500m in the last km. Hence the interpretation of 2-3 paves as 2 for rsf. However, Alkworld has now told me that although we only ride 500m, the power, distance, etc. are calculated as if it were one km for the last km.

2. As I've designed it now, the power, distance, etc. would be like 3 km with 2 paves – not 1km with 6 paves (but maybe its the same? I dont know) – however, I'll change it – maybe without any paves at all, because 1 paves is just a paves painted on the road

Thanks Donkey for the tips