cycling4freaks.com

Chense, you are perfectly right and of course I do not appreciate either Team Villinger behaviour. But there is 2 things important: - We can not Ban somebody based on presumption - Is using a bug cheating ? Based on presumption no but based on evidence by observation - And yes bug using is some kin...

Why should we ban him ? - He didnt break any fairplay rule - He used a bug ? What about sectricks ? correct this bug no reason at all to ban him. stop whinning guys... And act in a clever way when he is in your group to get rid of him. First I am always getting rid of him now that makes it a bit be...

Something else about it: Aux is meaning that Villinger seems to have some chance to win everysprint without sprinting in the racelog which makes him win every intermediate he wants ... looks somehow the same to me

I dont have any problems with firefox ... only little thing is that sometimes the cursor seems to "move" away so that I have to click the field beyond the one I want to hit but a refresh clears it. Edge sometimes is really slow for me.

Hey Buh, first thank you very much for your statement. Second big big thanks for all the work you have done about that game - I just enjoy playing everyday even if I may curse you sometimes for bugs or something. Third as i stated before I am not capable of programming and I dont have very much time...

Well indeed the problem with him is ... most teams just let him do it ... attack him to dead ... kill his riders ... attack him away ... steal his fun in doing those things thats the way to respond to him - at least i decided to and most teams in rsf are just whining and sheeping and letting him do ...

Looks nice this tour just some additions ...: Stage 5 - Its called Berchtesgaden not Bertechsgaden and theres nothing called Roßfeldpass - Its just Roßfeld. (Btw. Ahornkaser had very fine meals a few years ago :) ^^) And just a question for interest: Bad Reichenhall to Berchtesgaden - I presume you ...

Really feeling insulted by beeing called stupid is indeed a sign of a inferiority complex

Kapiers doch endlich mal ... wenn ich das fpk wäre würde ich das laufende gespamme auch ignorieren das nichts zum sachverhalt beiträgt ..

I'm probably not one of best player here but in math I was quite good, at least good enough to know that probability shows only show almost nothing with few dates. Example trough a dice with 6 faces few times we can get 2 times a 6 or a 3 and a 5, really difficult to know the result. But with big a...

Well interesting thought again ... but just take me as mediocre example:

I sometimes have some kind of monsters namely 77-80, 78-77 63sp, 84-71 but sometimes also only mostly average riders like 72-78,73-79 and so on

Afaik most functions dont work anymore with the old design ... but maybe ill just try it by running todays ttt

Die Erklärung finde ich aber ziemlich zweifelhaft weil ich die irgendwie schon 40-50 mal gehört habe ... aber gut das ist ne sache fürs FPK

Lol i eat drink make homework watch movies and whatever besides playing c4f ... and that with mostly disabled autorefresh

Ich verstehe nicht wieso 2 angeblich unterschiedliche Leute das gleiche Passwort nehmen und das obwohl sie eh schonmal aufgefallen sind

It prevents you from beeing taken out as long as you have the site open and just don´t refresh - I think the autorefresh does not work if you have c4f open in a second tab - but thats just a guess and I am not sure ... anyway its just some NOT needed thing

Complete utter bullshit. After rethinking it you are indeed right if it is not for all teams ... if you do it for all teams it could work as I neither know anybody who will give me his passport for copying it for a game nor i will be making a deposit that has to be high enough for using a multi ......

We have another case of brothers or not brothers ... why not just change the rules a bit to at least make it a bit harder ... I think we had this suggestion before anyway: When two teams want to play with the same ip: 1. When two accounts first login with the same IP a script should directly recogni...

Es ist jedes mal die gleiche Geschichte ... Bruder etc. Werde dazu auch nochmal kurz was posten gleich

Well we rode races like years without autorefresh and it worked it would be a way to keep the server more relaxed

but well we could discuss this in another topic in the technique part i think here its just about abolishing it for now for a test

cataracs wrote:I CAN'T PLAY the game without auto refresh.
*stop making a poll for any thing that comes in your mind...

Why shouldnt you be able to play without auto refresh? You cant push a (newly programmed and designed without this arrows and so on) refresh button?

But for the number of active teams better reduce the number of riders cause 126 means maximum 72 flat for 54 mountain which is in my opinion the lowest mountain value to start training a classic rider. But lets see what is going on

I like this suggestion ... auto-refresh is nothing special anyway ... like those 3 / 10 sec shit just make it 3 or 5 seconds for all and fine!

Hey - 126 looks a bit low for me indeed ... would have like it better to say 127 and make it max. 54-73 and 55-72 no 56 guys avalaible ... but well just test it now Better for sure, also the reduced number!

Hey guys,

i would need a sitter for tomorrow (saturday) 20 o clock Vuelta for the beginning of the stage!

Please PM Me